Continuation Acceptance Planner [AGPro Series]Continuation Acceptance Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is this continuation setup being accepted, delayed, or invalidated before the next decision point?
📌 Overview / What it does
Continuation Acceptance Planner is a chart-first continuation planning tool built to evaluate whether a pullback inside an active trend is producing real acceptance or only temporary hesitation.
The script builds a live continuation acceptance band around a trend base, scores the context from 0 to 100, maps the invalidation rail, checks target room against the nearest obstruction, and prints compact state labels such as ACCEPTED, DELAYED, PAUSED, WATCH, and INVALID.
It does not predict future price movement, automate entries, or produce guaranteed trade signals. Its role is to organize continuation context into a cleaner decision framework.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who want to judge continuation quality without turning every trend pullback into a signal.
Most continuation tools focus on bounce detection or trend strength only. This planner focuses on the decision layer: acceptance quality, pullback risk, target room, invalidation context, and the next action state.
The design supports a patient execution mindset. It helps the user ask whether the continuation is actually being accepted, still delayed, temporarily paused, too extended, or losing validity.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on generic trend continuation signals after a moving average touch or pullback bounce.
This script does NOT act as a simple buy/sell continuation indicator, and it does not clone a broad trend-continuation quality scanner.
Instead, it treats continuation as a planning problem: price must interact with an acceptance band, show a quality close, maintain enough room before obstruction, and stay above or below a clear invalidation rail.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script identifies bullish or bearish continuation context using fast, base, and slow EMA alignment plus trend slope.
2. Reference Mapping
It creates a continuation acceptance band around the base EMA and maps the invalidation rail using the band edge, slow EMA, and ATR buffer.
3. Reaction Evaluation
It evaluates pullback depth, close acceptance, volume support, and whether price is delaying, accepting, extending, or moving toward invalidation.
4. Visual Output
The script displays a centered acceptance-band label, invalidation and target guides, compact state labels, and a premium AG Pro planning panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the live continuation acceptance band around the trend base.
Labels = accepted, delayed, invalidation, or watch-state markers with optional 0-100 score.
Colors = bullish continuation context uses teal, bearish continuation context uses pink, delayed context uses amber, and risk or invalidation context uses red.
Panel = a compact decision dashboard showing Continuation Score, Acceptance, Pullback Risk, Target Room, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• ACCEPTED → continuation context has a qualified acceptance close and enough score to review.
• DELAYED → price is interacting with the acceptance band but has not produced enough clean acceptance.
• PAUSED → the prior continuation side still matters, but the trend stack needs to rebuild before the setup becomes clean again.
• WATCH → continuation context exists, but the setup still needs clearer reaction.
• EXTENDED → price is away from the acceptance band and may be late for clean continuation planning.
• INVALID RISK → price is moving beyond the planner's invalidation rail.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when continuation acceptance, delayed acceptance, invalidation risk, or blocked target room conditions appear.
Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions and should be interpreted with the broader chart context.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest continuation context appears when trend alignment, controlled pullback depth, close acceptance, volume support, and clean target room align.
When these components align, the continuation score improves and the panel moves toward a clearer planning state.
📊 When to Use
• Primary timeframe: 1H
• Secondary timeframe: 4H
• Trending markets with structured pullbacks
• Continuation setups after a controlled pause
• Pullbacks into a moving trend base
• Situations where target room and invalidation clarity matter
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• When expecting dense signals on 1D or 1W charts
• Very low liquidity environments
• Extremely noisy sideways conditions
• High-volatility shock moves where trend anchors distort quickly
• Markets with no clean trend alignment
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Sensitivity → changes how strict the acceptance engine is.
• Target Obstruction Lookback → defines the prior obstruction used for target-room evaluation.
• Acceptance Band Width ATR → controls the width of the continuation band.
• Confirmation Mode → defines whether acceptance requires close behavior only, close plus volume, or stricter alignment.
• Label and Panel Settings → control visual density, font size, panel location, and theme.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The panel is designed as a compact planning dashboard, not a data-heavy scanner.
The first row follows the AG Pro blue merged-header standard. The remaining rows focus only on the information needed for continuation planning: score, acceptance, pullback risk, target room, and action.
Chart visuals are intentionally controlled so the acceptance band, invalidation rail, target guide, and labels remain readable.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state.
2. Check whether price is interacting with the acceptance band.
3. Review the continuation score and pullback risk.
4. Compare target room with the invalidation rail.
5. Use labels and alerts as attention markers, not as automatic decisions.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think in terms of setup quality, not prediction.
A higher score means the current continuation context has stronger alignment across trend, pullback depth, close behavior, volume, and target room.
A delayed state means the idea is not necessarily invalid, but the chart has not yet produced clean acceptance.
A paused state means the prior continuation context is still nearby, but alignment weakened enough that patience matters more than chasing.
An invalidation-risk state means the continuation structure should be reassessed.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not an auto-trading system
• Not a guaranteed signal generator
• Not a generic support/resistance or order-block map
• Not a gap continuation planner or breakout acceptance planner
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Timeframe differences can change how continuation bands and target-room references appear.
Volatility expansion can move the acceptance band and invalidation rail quickly.
Low-volume or synthetic symbols may reduce the usefulness of the volume component.
All outputs are rule-based and should be interpreted within broader market context.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Continuation planning depends on trend structure, liquidity, volatility, and obstruction distance.
The cleanest cases usually appear when pullbacks are controlled, the acceptance close is clear, and the next obstruction is not too close.
In the current public-release tuning, the script reads cleanest on 1H charts and remains usable on 4H. Daily and weekly charts can still provide context, but they are less expressive for the intended acceptance-versus-delay workflow.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price pulls back into the acceptance band during a bullish trend and closes back above the base EMA with sufficient target room, the planner may shift toward ACCEPTED.
When price stays inside the band without a clean close, the planner may remain DELAYED.
When price closes beyond the invalidation rail, the planner flags INVALID RISK.
🧱 System Philosophy
The script follows the AGProLabs decision-engine approach: a useful public tool should help traders evaluate validity, strength, risk, target room, and the next action state.
It is built to guide interpretation, not to replace trader judgment.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can provide certainty.
No output from this script guarantees continuation, reversal, profit, or loss avoidance.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own decisions.
This script does not provide financial advice and should be used only as an educational and analytical tool.
📚 Educational Note
Use the planner to study how continuation acceptance develops across different symbols, sessions, volatility regimes, and timeframes.
Indicator
Market Structure Recovery Planner [AGPro Series]Market Structure Recovery Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Did damaged market structure recover with enough acceptance, risk clarity, and target room to deserve attention?
📌 Overview / What it does
Market Structure Recovery Planner is a chart-first planning tool for evaluating what happens after clean swing structure gets damaged and price attempts to repair the damaged rail.
The default design is strongest on 4H swing-structure charts, where the damage / recovery / repair-room sequence has enough space to be readable without becoming too sparse or too noisy.
The script maps a damaged structure rail, recovery pocket, risk edge, repair-room corridor, 0-100 recovery score, acceptance state, and a clear next-action panel. It does not try to predict price or automate decisions.
It is designed to make structure recovery easier to review: what broke, what was recovered, whether acceptance is building, where the plan becomes invalid, and whether enough structural room remains.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built to fill the gap between generic structure labels and full break-retest systems.
Many tools show a BOS, CHOCH, or support/resistance touch. Market Structure Recovery Planner focuses on the recovery phase after damage: the moment where structure may be repairing but still needs proof.
It supports traders who want a decision-engine workflow instead of another raw signal marker.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on detecting a structure break or plotting broad support and resistance zones.
This script does NOT clone BOS / CHOCH scanners, Structure Retest Planner, Reclaim Breakout Planner, or generic S/R maps.
Instead, it studies damaged swing structure and asks whether the damaged rail has been recovered with acceptance, participation, risk clarity, and enough room to matter.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script confirms swing structure using higher-high / higher-low or lower-high / lower-low behavior.
2. Damage Mapping
When clean structure loses its prior swing rail, the script records the damaged rail and the damage extreme.
3. Recovery Evaluation
Price must reclaim the damaged rail. The 0-100 score weighs damage depth, recovery close, acceptance hold, volume response, and room to target.
4. Visual Output
The chart shows the recovery pocket, risk edge, repair-room corridor, event labels, and a compact AG Pro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Recovery Pocket = the area around the damaged structure rail where repair quality is evaluated.
Risk Edge = the level where the active recovery plan should be reviewed as failed or invalidated.
Repair Room = the available structural space between the recovered rail and the next room reference.
Labels = compact state markers for damage, recovery, ready state, thin room, or failed recovery.
Panel = structure state, recovery score, acceptance, risk edge, and next action.
🚦 Signals & States
• Structure Damage Detected → a clean swing structure rail has been broken.
• Structure Recovery Detected → price recovered the damaged rail.
• Recovery Planner Ready → score, acceptance, and repair room meet the configured threshold.
• Repair Room Thin → recovery exists but available room is limited.
• Recovery Failed → price crossed the active risk edge.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when structure damage appears, recovery is detected, planner-ready state begins, repair room becomes thin, or the active recovery fails.
Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions and do not imply guaranteed outcomes.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The recovery context becomes stronger when structure damage is repairable, price closes back through the damaged rail, acceptance holds for several bars, volume participation improves, and room to the next structural reference remains open.
📊 When to Use
• 4H swing-structure review
• After a clean swing structure loses a key rail
• During trend repair attempts
• Around failed breakdown or failed breakout behavior
• When a trader needs risk / target / invalidation context after structural damage
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Very low timeframes where structure damage appears too often
• Very high timeframes where recovery states can stay expired for long periods
• Extremely low-liquidity markets
• Very noisy chop where swing structure changes constantly
• Major news candles with abnormal displacement
• Markets where volume data is unreliable and structure is too compressed
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Structure Swing Length → controls how selective the swing structure model is.
• Sensitivity → adjusts damage and recovery rail strictness.
• Timely Recovery Window → controls how long a damaged rail remains relevant.
• Planner Ready Score → sets the required quality threshold.
• Panel / Label Settings → control location, theme, size, and visual density.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is designed around a compact premium panel and clean chart-first visuals.
The first panel row uses the AG Pro title format. Zones are restrained and centered, labels are offset away from candles, and the chart remains readable while still showing enough state markers to avoid an empty look.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel structure state.
2. Check whether the damaged rail has a recovery pocket.
3. Review recovery score and acceptance.
4. Compare risk edge with repair room.
5. Treat the action row as a review state, not as an instruction.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think in stages: damage, recovery, acceptance, room, and failure.
A high score means the recovery context is cleaner according to the script rules. A low score means the repair is weak, late, thin, or poorly supported.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not auto trading
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a generic BOS / CHOCH scanner
• Not a generic support / resistance zone map
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Swing confirmation depends on the selected timeframe and pivot length.
Volatility can widen recovery pockets and change the quality score.
Market conditions can shift quickly, especially during news, low liquidity, or abnormal volume.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Structure recovery is most useful when the trader already understands the broader trend, liquidity environment, and volatility regime.
The script gives a structured review of damaged structure, not certainty about future price movement.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When bullish structure loses a higher-low rail and later closes back above that rail with acceptance, the script can mark a bullish recovery review.
When bearish structure loses a lower-high rail and later closes back below that rail, the script can mark a bearish recovery review.
🧱 System Philosophy
Market Structure Recovery Planner follows the AGPro Series approach: clear structure, rule-based scoring, readable visuals, and decision support without outcome promises.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can guarantee market direction, trade success, or certainty.
This tool provides structured context only.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and decisions.
This script does not provide financial advice.
📚 Educational Note
Use the script to study how structure damage and recovery behave across different symbols, sessions, and timeframes.
For public chart examples, 4H is the recommended default because it shows the structure-repair workflow most clearly.
Indicator
Structure Retest Planner [AGPro Series]Structure Retest Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is the active structure retest being accepted, rejected, or invalidated?
📌 Overview / What it does
Structure Retest Planner is a structure-based trade planning overlay designed to help traders evaluate how price behaves when it returns to an important swing-derived structure rail.
The script maps the active support-side or resistance-side rail, draws a focused retest box around that rail, scores the retest from 0-100, and projects practical invalidation and target guides. The goal is to organize the retest decision process: structure state, score, acceptance, invalidation, and next action.
It does not predict the next move, does not automate trading, and does not turn every swing point into a generic support/resistance signal. It is a decision-support planner for reading acceptance and rejection around a live structure retest.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who use price structure but need a cleaner way to judge whether a retest deserves attention.
Most structure tools identify levels, breaks, or swing labels. Structure Retest Planner focuses on the next decision after a rail is present: is price responding cleanly enough, is invalidation nearby, and what should be reviewed next?
The design supports a planning mindset rather than a signal-chasing mindset. It is meant to make the chart easier to interpret while keeping the trader responsible for context and risk.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on plotting structure breaks, BOS / CHoCH labels, or broad support and resistance zones.
This script does NOT clone a BOS / CHoCH detector and does NOT duplicate a first-break retest grader.
Instead, it treats the active structure rail as a planning reference and evaluates acceptance, rejection, volatility fit, trend agreement, invalidation distance, and next-action state in one workflow.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script confirms swing-derived structure rails using pivot logic and identifies whether the active planning side is support retest, resistance retest, or automatic nearest-rail context.
2. Reference Mapping
It draws a retest box around the active rail, plus an invalidation shelf and target guide. These are planning references, not guaranteed outcomes.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The 0-100 score combines level origin quality, retest response, close location, volatility fit, and trend agreement.
4. Visual Output
The script shows a centered retest-box label, compact event labels, rail/invalidation/target guides, alerts, and a premium AG Pro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the active retest box around the selected structure rail.
Labels = watch, accepted, rejected, invalidated, or risk-review states with optional score and grade.
Colors = teal for support-side acceptance, pink for resistance-side or rejection pressure, yellow for review states, and indigo for planning context.
Panel = structure state, retest score, acceptance state, invalidation shelf, and next action.
🚦 Signals & States
• Retest Watch → price is close enough to the active rail and the score is improving.
• Accepted → price tested the rail and closed constructively on the expected side.
• Ready → acceptance is active and the score reached the ready threshold.
• Rejected → price tested the rail but did not show clean acceptance.
• Invalidated → price closed beyond the invalidation shelf.
• Risk Review → retest behavior exists, but volatility is too hot for clean reading.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when the script detects a new watch state, accepted retest, high-quality retest review, rejected retest, or invalidation shelf break.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions and should always be interpreted with broader market context.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The score improves when the active rail has a cleaner structural origin, price reacts near the rail, the close lands on the expected side, volatility is not overheated, and trend context agrees with the retest side.
When these factors align, the retest context becomes easier to review. When they conflict, the panel shifts toward waiting, context confirmation, risk review, or reset.
📊 When to Use
• Pullbacks toward confirmed swing structure
• Trend continuation retests
• Resistance retests after bearish structure pressure
• Support retests after bullish structure pressure
• Markets where structure rails are visible and not excessively noisy
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Very low-liquidity symbols
• Extremely noisy sideways markets
• News-driven volatility spikes
• Markets where pivot structure is too compressed to provide useful rails
• Any situation where the user expects automated entry or exit instructions
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Retest Side → selects Auto, Support Retest, or Resistance Retest.
• Structure Pivot Length → controls how structure rails are confirmed.
• Sensitivity → changes retest-box width and activation behavior.
• Retest Ready Score → sets the minimum score for stronger review states.
• Invalidation Shelf ATR → adjusts the planning invalidation reference.
• Target Guide R Multiple → projects the forward target guide from planning risk.
• Label and Panel Font Size → controls visual readability.
• Panel Location and Theme → adjusts interface placement and style.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The panel is built as a compact planning dashboard with one merged blue AG Pro header row and five decision rows.
The chart visuals are intentionally restrained: one active retest box, centered box text, structure rail, invalidation shelf, target guide, and controlled labels.
The design goal is to make the active retest decision readable without turning the chart into a dense support/resistance map.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel to identify the active structure state.
2. Check whether price is approaching or testing the retest box.
3. Review the retest score and acceptance state.
4. Compare the invalidation shelf and target guide.
5. Use your own broader context before making any decision.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A higher score means the retest is cleaner within the script's rule set. It does not mean price must continue.
Acceptance means the bar closed constructively relative to the rail. Rejection means the rail is not holding cleanly. Invalidation means the planning reference has been crossed and the setup should be reviewed again.
Use the script to organize thinking, not to outsource judgment.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not auto trading
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a BOS / CHoCH auto detector
• Not a generic support/resistance zone map
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
The script uses pivot-based structure, so rails appear only after pivots are confirmed.
Timeframe choice, volatility, liquidity, and symbol behavior can materially change how retests appear.
Fast markets may pass through a rail before the retest can be evaluated cleanly. Sideways markets may create repeated low-quality tests.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Structure retests are easier to interpret when liquidity, trend context, and volatility are aligned.
A clean rail is not enough on its own. The reaction, close location, invalidation distance, and broader environment all matter.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price returns to a prior support rail and closes back above it with a strong lower wick, the planner may shift from watch to accepted if the score is high enough.
When price tests resistance but closes back below the rail with volatility under control, the planner may mark a cleaner resistance-side review state.
When price closes beyond the invalidation shelf, the planner marks the context as invalidated and the plan should be reset.
🧱 System Philosophy
Structure Retest Planner is part of the AGPro Series decision-engine direction: tools should help traders answer what is valid, how strong it is, where risk is, and what should be reviewed next.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No signal from this script guarantees continuation, reversal, or profit.
The output is a structured analytical read, not certainty.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and decisions.
This script does not provide financial advice and does not guarantee trading outcomes.
📚 Educational Note
Use the planner to study how structure retests behave across symbols and timeframes, especially how acceptance, rejection, volatility, and invalidation interact.
Indicator
Reversal Confirmation Planner [AGPro Series]Reversal Confirmation Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is a reversal actually confirming, or is it still only an early reaction?
📌 Overview / What it does
Reversal Confirmation Planner is a chart-first planning tool built to separate early reversal reactions from structured confirmation context.
The script detects sweep or wick-rejection reactions around recent swing references, then evaluates whether the reaction develops into a cleaner confirmation plan. It maps a confirmation pocket, invalidation edge, target-room band, compact event labels, alerts, and a clean AG Pro decision panel.
It does not predict reversals, automate entries, or scan every classical reversal pattern. The goal is to help traders organize the confirmation phase: reaction quality, confirmation close, momentum turn, volume support, room, invalidation, and next action.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who do not want to treat every wick, sweep, or counter-move as a valid reversal.
Many reversal tools mark the first reaction. This planner waits for structure. It asks whether price has moved from reaction into confirmation, whether momentum is turning, whether volume supports the shift, and whether the active plan has enough room before the next projected guide.
The design supports a decision-making workflow. It does not ask the user to chase every signal. It helps the user decide whether the reversal context is still early, building, confirming, confirmed, failed, expired, or already testing its room.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most reversal tools focus on detecting a pattern, labeling a wick, or marking every possible counter-trend reaction.
This script does NOT behave like a broad reversal-pattern scanner, double-top/double-bottom detector, head-and-shoulders module, 1-2-3 map, wedge detector, Turtle Soup map, liquidity sweep tool, or generic support/resistance zone script.
Instead, it works as a confirmation planner. The core workflow is reaction → confirmation pocket → invalidation edge → target-room context → next-action state. This keeps the public concept narrow, useful, and clearly separate from other AGPro reversal tools.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script watches for bullish or bearish reversal reactions using sweep behavior, wick rejection, candle close location, and prior directional context.
2. Reference Mapping
Once a reaction qualifies, the planner creates a confirmation line, confirmation pocket, invalidation edge, and target-room guide.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The model scores sweep or rejection quality, confirmation progress, momentum turn, volume support, and available room.
4. Visual Output
The chart shows the active confirmation pocket, centered target-room band, risk/target guide lines, compact labels, alert conditions, and an AG Pro panel with the current decision state.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Confirmation Pocket = the area between the reaction reference and the confirmation close line.
Invalidation Edge = the level beyond the reaction extreme where the active confirmation plan is considered failed by the script rules.
Target-Room Band = a projected planning zone that shows whether the reversal has enough forward room relative to the active risk distance.
Labels = compact state markers such as REACTION, CONFIRMING, CONFIRMED, FAILED, EXPIRED, ROOM TESTED, or PLAN.
Colors = teal supports bullish reversal planning, pink supports bearish reversal planning, amber marks developing context, indigo marks target-room context, and red marks invalidation or failed confirmation.
Panel = summarizes Reversal Stage, Confirmation Score, Invalidation, Room, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• REACTION → an early sweep or rejection is active, but confirmation is not complete.
• BUILDING → the context is improving, but the confirmation close is not fully qualified.
• CONFIRMING → price is testing or closing through the confirmation line with sufficient structure to review.
• CONFIRMED → the confirmation score and close behavior meet the script threshold.
• ROOM TESTED → the projected target-room guide has been reached after confirmation.
• FAILED → the active plan violated its invalidation edge.
• EXPIRED → the reaction did not confirm within the selected confirmation window.
🔔 Alerts Logic
The script includes alerts for bullish reaction, bearish reaction, bullish confirmation, bearish confirmation, failed confirmation, and high-quality confirmation.
Alerts trigger when the internal rule conditions are met. They are attention markers for chart review, not trade instructions, automated entries, or guaranteed reversal signals.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest confirmation context appears when multiple layers align:
• A clear sweep or rejection reaction forms.
• Price progresses through the confirmation pocket.
• Momentum begins to turn in the reaction direction.
• Volume support is not weak.
• The target-room band offers enough room relative to invalidation distance.
When these layers align, the confirmation score becomes stronger. When one or more layers are weak, the state usually remains reaction, building, expired, or failed.
📊 When to Use
• After visible sweep or rejection behavior.
• During possible reversal transitions after directional extension.
• Around swing references where confirmation matters more than the first wick.
• 4H swing-review charts, where the default label spacing and confirmation pockets usually have the cleanest visual balance.
• Daily charts when the user wants fewer but more selective reversal confirmation states.
• In markets where traders want to compare reaction quality, invalidation, and room before acting.
• For discretionary review of crypto, forex, indices, equities, and commodities on liquid charts.
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity symbols with unreliable wicks or volume.
• Very noisy micro-timeframes where reaction candles are unstable.
• News spikes or extreme volatility events where confirmation levels can be crossed erratically.
• Charts where the user expects a complete reversal-pattern scanner.
• Situations where the user wants automated trade execution.
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Confirmation Mode → controls whether labels and alerts wait for bar close or update live.
• Swing Reference Length → defines the recent swing references used for sweep-based reactions.
• Sensitivity → adjusts how selective the reaction model is.
• Confirmation Window Bars → limits how long a reaction can wait for confirmation.
• Minimum Reaction Score → controls the quality required before tracking a candidate.
• CONFIRMED Threshold → controls the minimum 0-100 score required for confirmed state.
• Preferred Room / Risk → adjusts how much forward room is preferred relative to invalidation distance.
• Visual settings → control pockets, bands, guide lines, labels, panel position, panel theme, and font sizes.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is built around a premium chart-first workflow.
The confirmation pocket and target-room band are concept-native visuals, not generic support/resistance zones. Their labels are centered inside the boxes for cleaner chart reading.
The default visual preset is tuned for 4H-style swing review: enough labels to keep the chart informative, but enough spacing to avoid a crowded reversal scanner look.
The AG Pro panel uses a compact structure with one merged blue title row and five decision rows. It is designed to show only the current planning context without turning the chart into a dashboard-heavy script.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state.
2. Check whether the chart is showing REACTION, BUILDING, CONFIRMING, CONFIRMED, FAILED, or EXPIRED.
3. Review the confirmation pocket and invalidation edge.
4. Compare target-room context against the room/risk readout.
5. Use alerts as review prompts, not as trade instructions.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Treat the first reaction as incomplete information.
A higher score means the reaction has developed more confirmation structure according to the script rules. It does not mean the reversal must continue.
A failed or expired state is also useful information. It tells the user that the reaction did not confirm cleanly under the selected rules.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine.
• Not financial advice.
• Not auto trading.
• Not guaranteed signals.
• Not a broad reversal-pattern scanner.
• Not a full liquidity sweep system.
• Not a generic support/resistance zone tool.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
All outputs are rule-based and depend on the selected inputs, timeframe, and symbol behavior.
Swing references confirm with natural delay. Wick structure can be noisy on low-liquidity symbols. Volume quality varies across markets. Fast volatility can cause reactions to confirm and fail quickly.
The confirmation score is an internal comparison model. It is useful for reading this script's framework, but it is not an objective probability model.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Reversal confirmation is strongest when price reacts from a meaningful extension, then follows through with cleaner close behavior and improving participation.
The script is intentionally focused on the confirmation phase. It does not attempt to map every higher-timeframe structure, order block, fair value gap, harmonic pattern, or reversal formation.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price sweeps below a recent swing low, closes back above it, then starts progressing through the confirmation pocket, the planner may shift from REACTION to BUILDING or CONFIRMING.
When price confirms but the room/risk readout is weak, the user can see that the reversal may be structurally less attractive inside this framework.
When price violates the invalidation edge before confirmation, the planner marks the context as FAILED instead of leaving the reaction visually ambiguous.
🧱 System Philosophy
The AGPro approach is to build decision engines, not decorative signal boards.
This script focuses on one clear question: did the reversal reaction earn confirmation, or is it still only a reaction?
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can confirm future price movement with certainty.
This tool provides structured context, not guarantees.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
This script is for educational, analytical, and chart-review purposes only. It does not provide financial advice, investment advice, or guaranteed trading outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions, risk management, position sizing, and broader market analysis.
📚 Educational Note
Use the planner to study how reactions mature, fail, expire, or confirm under consistent rules. The value is in disciplined interpretation, not in treating any single label as a complete trading system.
Indicator
Acceptance Breakout Planner [AGPro Series]Acceptance Breakout Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Did price truly accept beyond the breakout level, or did it only tag the level and fail to hold?
📌 Overview / What it does
Acceptance Breakout Planner is a chart-first breakout decision tool designed to evaluate what happens after price moves beyond a key rolling reference edge.
Instead of treating every breakout as meaningful, the script measures close persistence, time beyond the level, retest-hold behavior, range distance, candle quality, volume support, and failure shelf risk. It converts that evidence into a 0-100 Acceptance Score and a clear next-action state.
The script produces an acceptance band, a failure shelf, a target-room guide, controlled chart labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro planning panel. It does not predict price movement, automate execution, or claim that acceptance will continue.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built to fill the gap between a simple breakout marker and a full trade-management system.
Many traders can see when price crosses a level. The harder question is whether price is spending enough time beyond that level to deserve attention, or whether the break is only a low-commitment tag.
The design supports a planner mindset: observe the break, measure acceptance, watch the failure shelf, and review the next state with structure instead of reacting to a single candle.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most breakout tools focus on the moment price crosses a level.
This script does NOT function as a generic breakout signal, volume-spike detector, consolidation breakout box, Donchian channel tool, or broad break-retest scanner.
Instead, it focuses on post-break acceptance quality. The key question is not simply "did price break?" The key question is "did price remain accepted beyond the broken reference long enough to reduce tag-only risk?"
This keeps the script separate from Breakout Volume Quality, Consolidation Breakout Quality, Break-Retest Quality, Price Acceptance Profile, and reference-specific breakout tools in the AGPro catalog.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script maps rolling upper and lower reference edges from prior bars. These references are used only as breakout acceptance anchors.
2. Reference Mapping
When price closes beyond a reference edge by an ATR-adjusted buffer, the planner starts an active acceptance sequence.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The active sequence is scored through close persistence, time beyond the level, acceptance-band retests, candle quality, relative volume support, and distance from the failure shelf.
4. Visual Output
The chart shows an acceptance band, a failure shelf, a target-room guide, compact state labels, and a panel that summarizes acceptance score, time beyond, break side, failure risk, and action.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Acceptance Band = the zone around the broken level where price should hold if acceptance is developing.
Failure Shelf = the invalidation context behind the broken level. A close through this shelf means the breakout acceptance sequence needs review.
Target Room = a projected planning guide based on the prior reference range. It is not a forecast or promised target.
Labels = compact event markers such as BULL BRK, BEAR BRK, WATCH, HOLD, ACCEPT, TAG, RISK, and REJECT.
Colors = teal supports constructive acceptance, pink marks rejection or failure pressure, yellow marks caution, and indigo marks active watch states.
Panel = a compact decision view showing Acceptance Score, Time Beyond, Break Side, Failure Risk, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• BULL BRK → price closed beyond the upper reference and started an acceptance review.
• BEAR BRK → price closed beyond the lower reference and started an acceptance review.
• WATCH → acceptance evidence is improving but is not mature yet.
• HOLD → price revisited the acceptance band and held beyond the broken reference.
• ACCEPT → close persistence, score quality, and time beyond the level reached the accepted state.
• TAG → the sequence is active, but close persistence is still weak after the review window.
• RISK → acceptance is not mature and the failure shelf is becoming more relevant.
• REJECT → price closed through the failure shelf after the breakout sequence.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when a new acceptance break starts, when accepted state appears, when a retest hold is detected, when failure risk rises, or when price rejects through the failure shelf.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions, automation commands, or certainty statements.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest acceptance context appears when several conditions align:
• price closes beyond the broken reference more than once
• the acceptance band holds during a retest
• candle structure remains directional
• failure shelf distance remains healthy
• volume support is present without being the only reason for the score
When these elements align, the Acceptance Score rises and the state becomes easier to interpret.
📊 When to Use
• Breakout review after price crosses a visible range edge
• Markets where one-bar breakout tags are common
• Trend continuation attempts that need acceptance confirmation
• Range expansion moves where the trader wants to separate holding behavior from weak level pokes
• Chart review workflows that need a clear post-break next-action state
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity markets with unreliable candles
• Very noisy symbols where reference edges are constantly pierced
• News-driven volatility where ATR buffers may become unstable
• Situations where the user expects automatic trade entries
• Markets where volume data is missing and volume support is treated as less useful
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Break Side → controls whether the planner evaluates bullish breaks, bearish breaks, or both.
• Reference Lookback → defines the prior-bar range used to map breakout reference edges.
• Close Beyond Level ATR → controls how far beyond the level price must close before a sequence starts.
• Acceptance Band ATR → controls the retest-hold zone around the broken level.
• Failure Shelf ATR → controls the invalidation context behind the broken level.
• Minimum Beyond Closes → controls how much close persistence is required before acceptance can mature.
• ACCEPTED Threshold → sets the minimum 0-100 score for accepted state.
• Label / Panel Controls → adjust visual density, placement, theme, and font size.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is designed to stay chart-first. The acceptance band and failure shelf show the current structure, while labels mark only meaningful state changes.
The panel uses the AGPro standard: a single blue merged header row, compact rows, clear state colors, adjustable location, adjustable theme, and normal font size by default.
The visual hierarchy is intentionally restrained so the chart looks active without becoming crowded.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel to see the current Acceptance Score and action state.
2. Check whether price is holding beyond the broken reference or drifting back into the band.
3. Watch the failure shelf to understand whether the breakout is losing acceptance.
4. Review labels only as context markers, not as standalone decisions.
5. Confirm the broader market context before acting on any chart interpretation.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think of the script as a post-break acceptance reviewer.
A higher Acceptance Score means the breakout has stronger evidence of persistence according to the script model. A lower score means the move may still be early, weak, or vulnerable to failure.
The most useful reading is the relationship between time beyond the level, retest behavior, and failure shelf distance.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not an auto-trading system
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a generic support/resistance map
• Not a consolidation breakout box tool
• Not a pure volume breakout detector
• Not a full break-retest scanner
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Breakout acceptance is sensitive to timeframe, volatility, liquidity, and symbol behavior.
The reference edges are rolling and can change as older bars leave the lookback window.
ATR-based buffers can expand or contract during volatile market conditions.
Relative volume may be less useful on symbols with limited or inconsistent volume data.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Acceptance after a breakout is often more useful than the initial break itself.
A level tag shows that price reached a reference. Acceptance shows whether price can keep spending time beyond that reference.
This distinction is the core purpose of the planner.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price closes above a reference edge and then holds the acceptance band on a later retest, the script may shift from watch context toward stronger acceptance.
When price breaks a reference but quickly returns through the failure shelf, the script marks rejection context instead of treating the break as mature.
When price remains beyond the level but does not build enough persistence, the script can show TAG ONLY or FAILURE RISK.
🧱 System Philosophy
Acceptance Breakout Planner follows the AGPro decision-engine approach:
It does not ask users to react to a raw signal.
It organizes the chart into quality, state, risk, target-room context, and next-action review.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can remove uncertainty from markets.
No state, score, label, band, shelf, or alert guarantees future price behavior.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
This script is for educational and analytical use only.
It does not provide financial advice, investment advice, trade instructions, or guaranteed outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions, risk management, and market evaluation.
📚 Educational Note
Use the script to study the difference between a breakout tag and breakout acceptance.
The strongest value comes from comparing the planner state with broader structure, volatility, liquidity, and personal execution rules.
Indicator
Reclaim Breakout Planner [AGPro Series]Reclaim Breakout Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is a recently broken structural level being lost and reclaimed in a way that creates a valid breakout planning area?
📌 Overview / What it does
Reclaim Breakout Planner is a chart-first breakout planning tool built around structural pivot reclaim behavior. It detects when price breaks beyond a confirmed pivot level, temporarily moves back through that broken level, and then closes back on the breakout side with measurable acceptance quality.
The script produces a 0-100 Acceptance Score, an active Reclaim State, an Acceptance Pocket, a Risk Edge, a Target Corridor, controlled chart labels, and a compact AG Pro panel. The goal is to help traders organize reclaim context after a structural breakout attempt.
This script does not predict price direction, automate trades, or mark every pivot as important. It filters for a specific sequence: structural level break -> temporary level loss -> reclaim close -> planning state.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
Many breakout tools stop after price crosses a level. Many retest tools treat any return to the level as meaningful. This script was built for the narrower question that often matters after a breakout: did price briefly lose the broken level and then reclaim it with enough quality to deserve attention?
It is designed for traders who want a cleaner decision-support layer around breakout acceptance, not another crowded support/resistance map. The mindset is planning first: evaluate validity, score quality, locate risk, estimate target room, and decide whether the context deserves monitoring.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on the breakout candle or the retest touch.
This script does NOT clone VWAP Reclaim Quality, Previous Day Sweep & Reclaim, EMA reclaim maps, session VWAP reaction tools, or a simple breakout retest readiness model.
Instead, it focuses on structural pivot reclaim after a level is briefly lost. The reclaim must come from a confirmed pivot break, a temporary move back through the broken level, and a close back on the breakout side. That creates a distinct reclaim-planning workflow rather than a generic level scanner.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script identifies confirmed pivot highs and pivot lows as structural levels. These levels are not VWAP, previous-day highs/lows, session anchors, order blocks, or fixed support/resistance zones.
2. Breakout Arming
When price closes beyond a pivot level by an ATR-normalized amount, the planner arms a reclaim watch. A bullish watch begins after a close above resistance. A bearish watch begins after a close below support.
3. Reclaim Evaluation
The script waits for price to temporarily lose the broken level and then close back through it. It scores the event using reclaim close distance, retest depth, volume support, trend alignment, and wick rejection.
4. Visual Output
Accepted reclaims create an Acceptance Pocket, Risk Edge, Target Corridor, event labels, sparse context labels, and panel state. The visuals are designed to stay readable without leaving the chart empty.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Acceptance Pocket = the reclaimed structural level area where the breakout side is being tested.
Risk Edge = the failed-side reference beyond the pocket. It is a planning boundary, not a trading instruction.
Target Corridor = a projected review area based on the reclaim risk distance and the selected R multiple.
Labels = compact event and context markers such as Bull Reclaim, Bear Reclaim, Retest Watch, and Failed Reclaim. Target Review labels are optional because the target corridor already marks the review area.
Colors = bullish reclaim context uses teal, bearish reclaim context uses pink, caution/watch states use gold or indigo, and risk/failure context uses red.
Panel = shows Reclaim State, Acceptance Score, Risk Edge, Target Room, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• Scan Structure → no active reclaim plan exists yet.
• Bull Retest Watch → price broke above a structural pivot and is waiting for a valid reclaim sequence.
• Bear Retest Watch → price broke below a structural pivot and is waiting for a valid reclaim sequence.
• Acceptance Watch → reclaim exists, but the score is not strong enough for the highest planning state.
• Plan Review → reclaim quality is strong enough to monitor as structured planning context.
• Risk Edge Test → price is testing the failed-side boundary.
• Failed Reclaim → the active reclaim plan closed beyond the risk edge.
• Target Review → price reached the projected target corridor area.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Bullish Reclaim Breakout Plan triggers when a bullish structural reclaim is accepted and the score is above the alert threshold.
Bearish Reclaim Breakout Plan triggers when a bearish structural reclaim is accepted and the score is above the alert threshold.
Reclaim Risk Edge Failed triggers when an active reclaim plan closes beyond the risk edge.
Reclaim Target Corridor Reached triggers when price reaches the projected target corridor.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The context becomes stronger when a confirmed pivot breakout, temporary level loss, reclaim close, supportive volume, trend alignment, and wick rejection appear together. The score compresses those components into one readable 0-100 Acceptance Score.
📊 When to Use
• After structural breakouts where price returns to the broken level
• During trending or transitioning markets where reclaim behavior matters
• When evaluating whether a breakout level is being accepted after a brief failure
• When a trader needs risk edge and target-room context around a reclaim sequence
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Very low-liquidity symbols with unreliable volume and erratic candles
• Extremely noisy ranges where pivots form too frequently
• News-driven candles where ATR-normalized structure can be distorted
• Markets where price is far from any meaningful structural pivot
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Reclaim Side → selects Auto, Bullish Only, or Bearish Only.
• Pivot Strength → controls how selective structural levels are.
• Minimum Break Close ATR → defines how far beyond the pivot price must close before a reclaim watch is armed.
• Minimum Level Loss ATR → requires price to temporarily move back through the broken level before reclaim evaluation.
• Acceptance Pocket ATR → controls the visual and logical reclaim pocket size.
• Retest Window Bars → controls how long the reclaim watch remains valid.
• Risk Edge Buffer ATR → adjusts the failed-side planning boundary.
• Target Corridor R Multiple → controls the projected target review area.
• Label and Panel Settings → control chart label density, optional target review labels, font size, panel location, and panel theme.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is intentionally compact. The chart carries the main decision layer through acceptance pockets, risk edges, target corridors, and event labels. The panel acts as a quick readout for state, score, risk, target room, and next action.
The first panel row follows the AGPro style with a merged blue title row. Label density is controlled by cooldown and maximum visible label settings so the chart remains premium and readable.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state.
2. Check whether the planner is scanning, watching a retest, or showing an accepted reclaim.
3. Inspect the Acceptance Pocket and Risk Edge.
4. Compare the Acceptance Score with the active state.
5. Use the Target Corridor as a review area, not as a guaranteed objective.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A high score means the reclaim sequence is cleaner under the script's rules. It does not mean the market must continue.
A weak score means the reclaim lacks enough acceptance quality, volume support, trend alignment, or wick rejection.
A failed reclaim means the planning structure has weakened and should be re-evaluated in broader market context.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not auto trading
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a VWAP reclaim tool
• Not a previous-day sweep reclaim script
• Not a generic support/resistance map
• Not an order block or FVG scanner
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Timeframe selection affects pivot behavior. Lower timeframes may create more reclaim sequences, while higher timeframes may produce fewer but more important structural levels.
Volatility can widen pockets and risk edges. During extreme volatility, reclaim signals can appear later or fail faster.
Volume quality may be less reliable on markets where reported volume is synthetic, incomplete, or inconsistent.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Reclaim behavior often matters when a market tests whether a broken level is becoming accepted. A clean reclaim can show that a breakout area is still being defended. A failed reclaim can show that the attempted breakout lost structure.
The script treats that behavior as planning context, not certainty.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price closes above a pivot high, dips back below the broken level, then closes back above it with rejection wick and supportive volume, the planner may create a bullish reclaim plan.
When price closes below a pivot low, trades back above the broken level, then closes back below it with rejection behavior, the planner may create a bearish reclaim plan.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGPro tools are designed to help traders organize context, not chase isolated signals. This script follows that principle by turning reclaim behavior into a structured planning workflow with score, state, risk edge, target room, and action text.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can guarantee continuation, reversal, or future price behavior. Reclaim structure can fail, especially in fast, illiquid, or news-driven markets.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk. This script is for educational and analytical use only. It does not provide financial advice, investment advice, or guaranteed trading outcomes. Users remain responsible for their own decisions.
📚 Educational Note
Use the script to study how reclaimed structural levels behave across symbols, timeframes, and volatility environments. The best use is disciplined observation, comparison, and context building.
Indicator
Gap Continuation Planner [AGPro Series]TITLE
Gap Continuation Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is the active gap being accepted for continuation, or is it losing the structure needed for a clean plan?
📌 Overview / What it does
Gap Continuation Planner is a chart-first gap planning tool built to evaluate what happens after a gap appears. Instead of treating every gap as an automatic fill candidate, it asks whether price is accepting the gap edge, following through away from the gap, and preserving a measurable defense line.
The script produces a gap defense zone, a continuation corridor, an acceptance edge, a defense line, a target guide, compact labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro decision panel. The panel converts the live context into a 0-100 continuation score, fill-risk reading, and next-action state.
It does not predict future price, automate trades, or tell the user to buy or sell. It organizes observable gap behavior into a more disciplined continuation-planning framework.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who do not want to reduce every gap to a simple fill-or-fade idea.
Many gaps initially look strong, but the important question is whether the market continues to accept the gap after the first reaction. Gap Continuation Planner focuses on that middle layer: gap acceptance, follow-through, volatility load, defense quality, fill pressure, and forward room.
The design supports a planner mindset. The goal is to slow the decision process down and review whether the structure is valid enough to deserve attention.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most gap tools focus on gap detection, gap fill percentage, or historical gap zones.
This script does NOT work as a generic gap-fill reaction tool, support/resistance map, imbalance catalog, or automatic signal generator.
Instead, it treats the latest gap as a continuation planning object. The model studies whether price is accepting the continuation side of the gap, whether follow-through is developing, whether the defense line remains intact, whether fill risk is rising, and whether there is enough forward room for the plan to remain clean.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script detects classic opening gaps, wick gaps, body-separation gaps, and controlled continuation launch windows when adaptive mode is enabled.
2. Reference Mapping
Each accepted gap creates a gap defense zone, an acceptance edge, a defense line, and a target guide.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The engine scores gap size, open acceptance, follow-through, volatility load, fill risk, and forward room.
4. Visual Output
The chart displays a centered gap-zone label, a centered continuation-corridor label, event labels, planner lines, and a compact AGPro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the detected gap defense area.
Continuation corridor = the forward planning area between the accepted gap edge and target guide.
Acceptance edge = the side of the gap that price should hold for continuation structure to remain stronger.
Defense line = an ATR-buffered invalidation reference beyond the far side of the gap.
Labels = state changes such as new gap, acceptance watch, continuation ready, defense review, or failed acceptance.
Colors = bullish continuation context uses teal, bearish continuation context uses pink, watch states use indigo, and caution states use amber.
Panel = summarizes gap state, continuation score, defense line, fill risk, and next action.
🚦 Signals & States
• New Gap → a fresh gap continuation window has been detected.
• Acceptance Watch → price is holding the continuation side of the gap, but follow-through still needs confirmation.
• Continuation Ready → the gap has stronger acceptance, follow-through, room, and risk structure.
• Defense Test → price is retesting the gap edge or defense area.
• Fill Risk → the gap is being penetrated enough to reduce continuation quality.
• Gap Failed → the active gap has lost continuation acceptance.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when a new gap continuation window appears, when the gap reaches READY state, when acceptance watch begins, when defense review becomes relevant, or when gap acceptance is lost.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions and do not guarantee that continuation will occur.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest continuation context appears when gap size, gap-edge acceptance, follow-through distance, stable volatility, low fill pressure, and enough forward room align.
When these elements align, the continuation score improves. When fill pressure rises or volatility becomes too hot, the score weakens.
📊 When to Use
• After opening gaps in stocks, indices, futures, or session-based markets
• During continuation attempts after a strong gap
• When reviewing whether a gap is holding acceptance or losing structure
• Around breakout continuation sessions where risk and target references need to be visible
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity markets
• Very noisy or overlapping session opens
• News-driven gaps with unstable spreads
• Markets where volume and session structure behave unusually
• Environments where price is already far beyond a reasonable risk reference
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Sensitivity → adjusts how strict the gap and score requirements are.
• Gap Mode → controls whether the script reads classic gaps only or adaptive continuation windows.
• Acceptance Bars → changes how many bars must hold the continuation side of the gap.
• Follow-Through ATR → controls the preferred travel away from the gap edge.
• Defense Buffer → sets the ATR spacing for the defense line.
• Forward Room Lookback → helps estimate whether nearby structure limits continuation room.
• Minimum Continuation Score → sets the READY threshold.
• Visual settings → control zones, corridors, lines, labels, object limits, and panel appearance.
• Show Failed / Stale Objects → controls whether old failed corridors remain visible. It is disabled by default for a cleaner publication view.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is built for quick planner-style review. The chart carries the structural map, while the panel provides the decision summary.
The first panel row follows the AGPro merged blue header standard. The remaining rows focus only on the practical planning fields: state, score, defense, fill risk, and action.
The visual hierarchy is intentionally restrained so the gap, corridor, and labels are readable without turning the chart into a crowded signal map.
By default, failed or stale gap objects are hidden after they lose live planning value. Event labels remain available so the chart keeps context without carrying too many old failed boxes.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state and continuation score.
2. Check whether price is holding the gap acceptance edge.
3. Review the continuation corridor and target guide.
4. Compare fill risk against the defense line.
5. Use alerts as review markers, not execution commands.
6. Confirm the context with broader market structure, liquidity, and personal risk rules.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A high continuation score means the active gap has stronger structure inside this model. It does not mean the move must continue.
Low fill risk supports continuation structure. Rising fill risk means price is starting to challenge the gap.
The defense line is a planning reference. It is not a guaranteed stop level and should not replace the user's own risk process.
Continuation corridors are visual planning areas, not promised target zones.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
This script is not a prediction engine.
This script is not financial advice.
This script is not an auto-trading system.
This script does not provide guaranteed signals.
This script does not replace independent confirmation, risk management, or execution discipline.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Gap behavior varies heavily across asset classes, sessions, and timeframes.
Adaptive launch windows can help continuous markets, but they should still be interpreted as structured gap-like planning areas rather than classic exchange-session gaps.
High volatility can make defense and target references wider.
Low liquidity can distort gap quality, label timing, and fill-risk readings.
No rule-based script can fully account for news, slippage, spread changes, or sudden liquidity shifts.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Gap continuation is often more meaningful when it aligns with trend pressure, session participation, volatility structure, and clean forward room.
A gap is not important simply because it exists. It becomes more useful when price accepts one side of it and maintains a measurable defense structure.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price gaps up, holds above the gap edge, and the continuation score improves, the script can help review whether the gap is being defended.
When price gaps down and repeatedly rejects back below the gap edge, the panel can help evaluate bearish continuation structure.
When fill risk rises quickly, the script highlights that the gap may be losing acceptance rather than continuing cleanly.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGProLabs tools are built around structured interpretation. The goal is not to add more signals to the chart. The goal is to turn market behavior into a cleaner review process.
Gap Continuation Planner follows that approach by converting a raw gap into a measurable planning object.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can remove uncertainty.
No score can guarantee continuation.
No planner can replace the trader's responsibility to manage risk.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
This script is provided for educational and analytical use only.
It does not provide financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or guaranteed outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions, risk management, position sizing, and execution.
📚 Educational Note
The strongest use of this tool is to study whether a gap is being accepted or rejected as structure develops. It is designed to support review, patience, and disciplined interpretation.
Indicator
Initial Balance Break Planner [AGPro Series]Initial Balance Break Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is the Initial Balance break being accepted, or is it becoming vulnerable to failure back inside the balance?
📌 Overview / What it does
Initial Balance Break Planner is an intraday session planning tool built around the first major balance of the trading session. It maps a configurable Initial Balance window, tracks the first break beyond that balance, and evaluates whether that break has enough quality to deserve structured review. The default showcase workflow is designed for intraday charts up to 60 minutes.
The script produces a locked Initial Balance box, break review labels, acceptance labels, failure-risk labels, failed-IB markers, target rails, and an invalidation reference. The panel summarizes the active state through IB State, Break Side, Acceptance Score, Failure Risk, and Action.
It does not predict future price movement, automate trades, or tell the user what to buy or sell. It is a rule-based decision-support overlay for reading Initial Balance behavior with more structure.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built to solve a common intraday problem: many traders can see that price broke the first balance, but they still need a cleaner way to judge whether that break is accepted, stretched, weak, or vulnerable.
The tool is designed for traders who use session structure, Initial Balance concepts, intraday breakouts, and structured risk review. Its purpose is not to create another simple breakout signal. Its purpose is to turn the Initial Balance break into a practical planning framework.
The design philosophy is simple: map the balance, evaluate the break, show the risk, project the planning rails, and keep the next action readable.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most opening-range tools focus on basic breakout direction, raw high/low levels, or target projections.
This script does NOT clone ORB Quality or Opening Range Failure Zones. ORB Quality is focused on opening range breakout quality and drive continuation. Opening Range Failure Zones is focused on failed opening range probes and reclaim zones.
Instead, Initial Balance Break Planner focuses on the post-IB decision layer: is the first Initial Balance break accepted, does the retest response support the break, where is the invalidation reference, where are the target rails, and what should the trader review next?
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script builds the Initial Balance from a configurable session window. The default uses the first 60 minutes of the New York regular session.
2. Reference Mapping
Once the IB window ends, the script locks the IB high, IB low, and midpoint. The box remains centered with an internal state label so the chart stays visually clear.
3. Reaction Evaluation
After the first break, the planner scores the setup using:
• IB width
• Break close quality
• Retest response
• Relative volume support
• Volatility fit
4. Visual Output
The chart displays break labels, acceptance labels, risk-review labels, failed-IB markers, target rails, and an invalidation rail. The panel converts the model into a compact next-action state.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
The Initial Balance box represents the first session balance selected by the user.
Break labels show when price closes beyond the IB edge with enough buffer to start review.
Acceptance labels appear when the break has enough score, enough confirmation time, and controlled failure risk.
Failure-risk labels warn that the break is weakening or returning back inside the balance.
Target rails show measured planning references from the broken IB edge.
The invalidation rail marks the area where the break begins losing acceptance quality.
Panel colors summarize the current state:
• Teal → stronger acceptance or constructive long-side context
• Pink → bearish break side or failed context
• Amber → watch, risk review, or unresolved state
• Indigo / blue → active planning context
🚦 Signals & States
• IB READY → the Initial Balance has locked and the planner is ready to track the first break
• BREAK UP REVIEW → price closed beyond the upper IB edge and long-side review has started
• BREAK DOWN REVIEW → price closed beyond the lower IB edge and short-side review has started
• RETEST HOLD → price retested the broken IB edge without clearly losing it
• ACCEPTED → the break met the acceptance threshold with controlled failure risk
• RISK REVIEW → the break is not yet accepted and failure vulnerability is rising
• FAILED IB → price failed back inside the Initial Balance with elevated weakness context
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when the script detects:
• A bullish IB break review
• A bearish IB break review
• Bullish IB acceptance
• Bearish IB acceptance
• Failure-risk review
• Failed return back inside the IB
Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest context appears when the break close is clean, the IB width is balanced, volume is supportive, volatility is not overheated, and the retest response holds the broken edge.
When these elements align, the Acceptance Score improves and the panel can move from Observe Retest into Review Long or Review Short.
📊 When to Use
• Intraday markets with clear session structure
• 1-minute to 60-minute charts
• Index, futures, FX, and liquid crypto sessions
• Initial Balance breakout review
• Session expansion planning
• Post-break retest evaluation
• Risk and target planning after the first session balance breaks
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Very low-liquidity symbols
• Extremely noisy micro timeframes
• Markets with poor session definition
• Events with abnormal volatility spikes
• Symbols where volume data is unreliable and should not be weighted heavily
• Higher timeframes where the selected IB session has little practical meaning
• 4H, daily, weekly, or monthly charts where a one-session Initial Balance cannot be mapped cleanly
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Initial Balance Window → defines the balance-building period
• Tracking Session → defines when break review can update
• Sensitivity → adjusts how selective the planner is
• Acceptance Lookback → controls the review window after the first break
• Minimum Acceptance Score → sets the threshold for accepted-break states
• Confirmation Mode → chooses confirmed-bar behavior or live updating
• Break Buffer ATR → controls how far price must close beyond the IB edge
• Retest Response Buffer ATR → controls retest tolerance around the broken edge
• Failure Buffer ATR → controls how quickly returning inside the IB raises risk
• Target Rail Multiples → control measured target references
• Max Visible IB Boxes → controls how many recent balance boxes stay on the chart
• Max Visible Labels → controls how many recent event labels stay on the chart
• Show IB Ready Labels → optionally displays a readiness label when the Initial Balance locks
• Visual Settings → control labels, box count, rail projection, and spacing
• Panel Settings → control panel visibility, location, theme, and font size
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The script uses a chart-first design. The Initial Balance box is the main anchor, and the centered box label keeps the active state visible without requiring a large dashboard.
Event labels are deliberately compact and offset away from candles. Target rails and invalidation rails are projected only after a break, so the chart remains clean during the balance-building phase.
The AG Pro panel uses a single merged blue header row and five compact rows so the user can quickly scan state, side, score, risk, and action.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel after the Initial Balance locks.
2. Wait for price to break one IB edge.
3. Check whether the break receives a clean score or moves into risk review.
4. Watch the broken edge for retest behavior.
5. Use the target rails and invalidation rail as planning references.
6. Interpret the result within broader market context.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
The Acceptance Score is a quality score, not a prediction. Higher scores mean the break has better internal structure according to the script's rules.
Failure Risk is a warning layer. It rises when price loses acceptance quality, moves back inside the IB, shows weak close behavior, or lacks participation.
The Action row is the most practical summary. It helps the user decide whether the environment is still building, waiting, reviewing, accepted, vulnerable, or better left alone.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not auto trading
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a generic ORB breakout system
• Not Opening Range Failure Zones
• Not a broad support/resistance or order-block map
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Initial Balance behavior changes across symbols, sessions, and timeframes. A 60-minute IB on one market may behave differently from the same window on another market.
Relative volume can be less useful on symbols where reported volume is incomplete or inconsistent.
Fast news events, thin liquidity, and unusual volatility can reduce the usefulness of any session-break model.
The script evaluates rule-based context only. It cannot know future order flow or guarantee what price will do next.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Initial Balance analysis is most useful when the session has a meaningful opening phase and a clear expansion phase.
A clean break usually needs more than a line cross. The break should show location, acceptance, participation, and controlled risk.
A weak break can still travel further, and a strong break can still fail. The script is designed to help structure the review, not remove uncertainty.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price breaks above the IB high, receives a strong acceptance score, holds the broken edge on retest, and keeps failure risk low, the panel may move into Review Long.
When price breaks below the IB low but quickly returns back inside the balance with weak close quality, the panel may move into Failure Watch or Failed Back In.
When the IB is too wide, volatility is unstable, and the break lacks volume support, the planner can remain cautious even if price has crossed the edge.
🧱 System Philosophy
The AGPro Series approach is built around decision structure, not raw signal output.
Initial Balance Break Planner follows that philosophy by combining a visible session reference with a score, risk layer, target references, and a next-action panel.
The goal is to make the chart easier to interpret without making the chart crowded.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
This script does not provide certainty.
It does not guarantee that an accepted break will continue or that a vulnerable break will reverse.
All outputs should be interpreted as structured analytical context.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own analysis, execution, and risk management.
This script is not financial advice and does not provide guaranteed trading outcomes.
📚 Educational Note
Initial Balance analysis can help traders study how a session moves from balance into expansion, but it should always be combined with broader market structure, liquidity, volatility, and personal execution rules.
Indicator
Opening Drive Quality [AGPro Series]Opening Drive Quality
🧠 Core Idea
Is the first directional drive of the session strong enough to plan around, or is it already losing execution quality?
📌 Overview / What it does
Opening Drive Quality is a session execution planner that evaluates the first directional drive after the market opens. It studies the opening drive channel, early follow-through, pullback acceptance, risk-line integrity, and target-room structure in one clean decision framework.
The script produces a 0-100 quality score, a clear next-action state, an opening drive channel, a pullback acceptance zone, an invalidation risk line, target guide, compact chart labels, alerts, and a premium AGPro panel.
It does not predict price direction, automate trades, or mark every opening range breakout. Its purpose is to help traders evaluate whether the early session drive has enough structure, acceptance, and risk clarity to deserve attention.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
The script was built for traders who need more than an opening range box or a simple breakout marker. The first session move often sets the tone, but the useful question is not only whether price moved. The useful question is whether that move produced clean follow-through, controllable risk, and a meaningful pullback area.
Opening Drive Quality fills that gap by turning the opening move into a structured planning map. It supports traders who study session execution, intraday momentum, and pullback planning without relying on generic signals.
The design philosophy is simple: evaluate the quality of the first drive, define the risk line, project the pullback acceptance zone, and make the next state readable at a glance.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on opening range breakouts, session boxes, fixed kill zones, or failed-break signals.
This script does NOT try to clone a generic ORB tool, a kill-zone session engine, or an opening range failure map.
Instead, it focuses on the quality of the first directional drive itself. It asks whether the drive has real thrust, whether follow-through appears after the drive locks, whether price accepts a pullback zone, where the risk line sits, and what the next planning state should be.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script builds the opening drive from either a fixed session window or the first bars of a new day. This keeps the tool useful across regular-market assets and 24/7 markets.
2. Reference Mapping
After the drive locks, the script maps the opening drive channel, pullback acceptance zone, invalidation risk line, and target-room guide. These references come from the opening drive structure, not from generic support and resistance pivots.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The engine scores drive thrust, close location, range expansion, optional relative volume, follow-through distance, pullback behavior, and risk-line integrity.
4. Visual Output
The chart shows the active drive channel, projected pullback zone, risk line, target guide, state labels, and a compact panel with the key planning reads.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Opening Drive Channel = the locked first directional drive of the session.
Pullback Acceptance Zone = the area where a controlled pullback can be evaluated after a valid drive.
Risk Line = the invalidation line derived from the drive base, pullback zone, and ATR buffer.
Target Guide = a projected target-room reference based on the opening drive range.
Labels = compact markers for drive lock, follow-through, pullback acceptance, weak drive, risk break, and target check.
Colors = teal for bullish drive context, pink for bearish drive context, amber for review states, and indigo for structural emphasis.
Panel = the decision layer showing Drive Side, Follow-Through, Pullback Quality, Risk Line, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• DRIVE Q → the opening drive has locked and received a 0-100 quality score.
• FOLLOW Q → the drive has produced directional follow-through after locking.
• PULLBACK ACCEPTED → price is reacting constructively inside the projected pullback acceptance zone.
• WEAK DRIVE → follow-through has not developed inside the review window.
• RISK BROKEN → the active drive has violated its invalidation line.
• TARGET CHECK → price has reached the projected target-room guide.
🔔 Alerts Logic
The script includes alerts for:
• Opening Drive Quality Locked → a qualified opening drive has completed.
• Drive Follow-Through → directional extension appears after the drive locks.
• Pullback Accepted → price reacts inside the projected pullback acceptance zone.
• Risk Line Broken → price violates the active drive risk line.
• Target Guide Reached → price reaches the projected target-room guide.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The context becomes stronger when opening drive thrust, close location, session volatility, relative volume, follow-through, and pullback acceptance align.
The context becomes weaker when the opening drive locks with poor thrust, cannot extend, pulls back too deeply, or breaks the risk line.
📊 When to Use
• Intraday session planning.
• Opening-drive analysis after the first market push.
• Markets where the opening session often defines early direction.
• Pullback planning after a strong first drive.
• Session review where risk line and target-room context matter.
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Very low-liquidity markets.
• Extremely noisy opens with unstable spreads.
• News-driven bars where the first drive is unusually distorted.
• Assets where the selected opening session is not meaningful.
• Higher timeframes where the opening drive window has no practical session context.
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Opening Drive Mode → chooses first bars of day or a fixed session window. First Bars Of Day is the default so the chart loads with visible drive structure across more symbols.
• Opening Drive Session → defines the drive-building window.
• Tracking Session → defines when follow-through and pullback logic remains active.
• Minimum Quality Threshold → controls when stronger planning labels appear.
• Follow-Through ATR → defines the extension needed for follow-through confirmation.
• Pullback Acceptance Depth → controls the projected pullback zone depth.
• Risk Line Buffer ATR → adjusts the invalidation line beyond the drive structure.
• Target Guide Multiple → controls the projected target-room guide.
• Panel / Label Settings → control panel location, theme, font size, label size, visible label count, minimum label quality, label cooldown, and optional compact plot markers.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is built around a clean AGPro panel and chart-first planning visuals. The panel uses a single merged blue header row with only the script name, then five practical rows: Drive Side, Follow-Through, Pullback Quality, Risk Line, and Action.
The chart uses one opening drive channel, one pullback acceptance zone, one risk line, one target guide, and compact labels. The goal is a premium session-planning view without clutter.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel after the opening drive locks.
2. Check whether the drive side and score show a valid planning context.
3. Watch follow-through quality after the drive locks.
4. Evaluate whether price pulls back into the acceptance zone constructively.
5. Use the risk line and target guide as planning references, not automatic decisions.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A strong score means the opening drive has better structure, cleaner close location, stronger volatility context, and better follow-through support.
A pullback acceptance label means price is reacting inside the projected drive-based zone. It does not mean price must continue.
A risk-line break means the original drive plan has lost structural integrity and should be reassessed.
The most useful interpretation comes from combining the panel state with broader market context, liquidity, and timeframe alignment.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine.
• Not financial advice.
• Not an auto-trading system.
• Not guaranteed signals.
• Not a generic support and resistance mapper.
• Not a clone of an ORB breakout tool.
• Not a kill-zone timing dashboard.
• Not an opening range failure scanner.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Timeframe selection affects the opening drive shape. A 5-minute chart and a 15-minute chart can produce different drive channels.
Volatility changes can expand or compress the pullback zone and risk line.
Session definitions matter. The selected opening window should match the asset being studied.
High-impact news, abnormal spreads, and low liquidity can reduce the reliability of the opening drive map.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Opening drives are most useful when liquidity is active and the first session push creates a clear directional reference. A clean drive does not guarantee continuation, but it can create a structured area for evaluating pullback acceptance and invalidation.
The script intentionally keeps its references tied to the opening drive. It avoids pivot maps, order block language, broad S/R zones, and generic failed-break logic.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price locks a strong bullish opening drive, extends beyond the channel, and then pulls back into the acceptance zone without breaking the risk line, the panel may shift toward a constructive planning state.
When price locks a drive but cannot create follow-through inside the review window, the script can mark the drive as weak and shift the action state toward bias reduction.
When price violates the risk line, the original opening drive plan is no longer structurally intact inside this model.
🧱 System Philosophy
Opening Drive Quality follows the AGPro decision-engine philosophy: a script should help the trader evaluate validity, strength, risk, target room, and next state instead of only printing another signal.
The tool is designed to make the opening session easier to interpret through structured references and clean visual hierarchy.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can provide certainty.
No opening drive model can guarantee continuation, reversal, or profitability.
This script provides structured context only.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own decisions.
This script does not provide financial advice, investment advice, or guaranteed trading outcomes.
📚 Educational Note
Use this script as an educational planning and visualization tool. The strongest use comes from reading the opening drive together with broader market structure, liquidity, volatility, and personal risk rules.
Indicator
Range Escape Planner [AGPro Series]Range Escape Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is price escaping a mature range with enough quality to monitor, or is the move still vulnerable to failure?
📌 Overview / What it does
Range Escape Planner is a chart-first breakout quality and trade planning tool built around mature range escape behavior.
Instead of printing a generic breakout signal, the script maps the active range boundary, projected escape corridor, invalidation edge, target guide, obstruction room, follow-through quality, and retest behavior. These components are converted into a 0-100 Escape Score and a clear next-action state.
The script produces a range boundary box, escape corridor, risk/target guide lines, compact labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro planning panel. It does not predict future price movement, automate decisions, or guarantee that a range escape will continue.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who want to evaluate breakout quality after price leaves a mature range.
Many breakout tools identify the break itself but stop before answering the practical planning questions: is the range mature, is the close beyond the boundary strong enough, is volatility expanding constructively, is there clean room, and where is the failure reference?
The design philosophy is simple: a range escape is only useful when it has maturity, confirmation, room, and a readable invalidation edge.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on basic range breaks, box breakouts, session opening ranges, or simple breakout markers.
This script does NOT clone Darvas Box Breakout Quality, does NOT rebuild an ORB model, and does NOT act as a generic consolidation breakout signal.
Instead, it treats the move as a planning problem. The main output is not a buy or sell command. It is a structured state that helps users separate VALID ESCAPE, ESCAPE WATCH, RANGE READY, OBSTRUCTION, FAILED, and WAIT RANGE conditions.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script maps the prior range from previous bars and checks whether price is still inside, near an edge, or closing beyond the boundary.
2. Reference Mapping
It draws the mature range, escape edge, invalidation edge, projected target guide, and older swing obstruction room.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The model scores range maturity, close beyond range, volatility expansion, follow-through, retest quality, and obstruction room.
4. Visual Output
The result is displayed through centered zone labels, compact event labels, guide lines, deterministic alerts, and a premium AGPro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the range box shows the active mature range. The escape corridor shows the projected planning path from the broken boundary toward a target guide. Zone text is centered inside the boxes.
Labels = compact markers identify RANGE READY, ESCAPE WATCH, VALID ESCAPE, RETEST HOLD, OBSTRUCTION, and FAILED context.
Colors = green highlights cleaner long-side escape quality, pink highlights short-side or failure risk, amber highlights review conditions, and indigo highlights watch or mature-range context.
Panel = the panel summarizes Escape Score, Range Age, Confirmation, Obstruction, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• RANGE READY → the range is mature and price is near an escape edge.
• ESCAPE WATCH → price has escaped the range, but follow-through or retest confirmation is still incomplete.
• VALID ESCAPE → the escape has stronger score alignment, follow-through or retest support, and acceptable obstruction context.
• RETEST HOLD → price retested the escape edge and held outside the prior range.
• OBSTRUCTION → the escape is active, but older structure may limit clean room.
• FAILED → price returned through the escape edge and the escape context is no longer clean.
• WAIT RANGE → no mature range escape context is active.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when the planner detects RANGE READY, New Range Escape, ESCAPE WATCH, VALID ESCAPE, RETEST HOLD, OBSTRUCTION REVIEW, or FAILED ESCAPE conditions.
These alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions, entry signals, or automated strategy commands.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest context appears when a range is mature, price closes beyond the range boundary, volatility expands constructively, candle follow-through improves, the broken edge holds on retest, and obstruction room remains acceptable.
When these components align, the Escape Score improves and the state can progress from RANGE READY to ESCAPE WATCH or VALID ESCAPE.
📊 When to Use
• During range breakout and range expansion review
• 4H and multi-hour swing charts where the range structure has enough space to breathe
• After price has spent time inside a defined range
• When evaluating whether a breakout has clean follow-through
• When a trader needs a visible invalidation edge and target-room reference
• On liquid markets where ATR, range, and swing structure are readable
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Very low-liquidity symbols with unstable candles
• Extremely noisy micro-timeframes
• Very compressed intraday charts where labels and range boxes can crowd the price action
• News-driven spikes where price gaps far beyond the range
• Markets where older swing structure is too messy to define clean obstruction room
• Situations where the user expects a signal-only entry tool
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Planning Side → controls Auto, Long Escape, or Short Escape mode.
• Range Lookback → controls how the prior range boundary is mapped.
• Minimum Range Age → defines how mature the range should be before stronger scoring.
• Minimum Close Beyond Edge ATR → controls how far price must close beyond the boundary before an escape registers.
• Follow-Through ATR → defines stronger post-escape movement beyond the edge.
• Retest Tolerance ATR → controls how close price can revisit the broken boundary and still count as a hold.
• Obstruction Lookback → controls how older swing structure is checked for clean room.
• Label and Panel Font Size → controls chart labels, centered box text, and panel readability.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is designed to stay chart-first.
The range box defines the active decision area. The escape corridor shows the forward planning path. The invalidation, target, and obstruction lines add context without turning the chart into a crowded signal board.
The AGPro panel provides a compact decision summary with a merged blue title row and clear state hierarchy.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state and Escape Score.
2. Check whether the range is mature enough.
3. Review the escape corridor and edge line.
4. Check confirmation, retest behavior, and obstruction room.
5. Treat alerts as attention markers, then evaluate broader market context.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think in terms of escape quality, not prediction.
A stronger score means multiple structural conditions are aligned. A weaker score means the escape may be premature, poorly confirmed, obstructed, too noisy, or already failed.
OBSTRUCTION is especially important because a range can break cleanly while nearby older structure still limits practical room.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not an auto-trading system
• Not a guaranteed signal tool
• Not a Darvas Box clone
• Not an ORB model
• Not a generic support/resistance zone map
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
The script is rule-based and depends on recent price, volatility, range, and older swing structure.
Timeframe differences can change how range maturity and escape quality appear. Volatility spikes can distort the score. Thin markets can create false escape or failure behavior.
Outputs should always be interpreted with broader market structure, liquidity, and risk context.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Range escape behavior is most useful when a readable balance area exists before expansion.
An escape with no follow-through may still be early. An escape with immediate obstruction may require extra caution. An escape that returns through the broken edge is treated as failed context, not as a new opposite prediction.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price closes beyond a mature range, volatility expands from normal conditions, the candle holds beyond the edge, and older obstruction room is clean, the planner may classify the move as VALID ESCAPE.
When price breaks the boundary but quickly returns through the edge, the planner may classify the context as FAILED.
When price escapes but older swing structure is immediately ahead, the planner may show OBSTRUCTION even if the score is otherwise improving.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGPro planning tools are designed to help traders evaluate context before reacting.
This script follows that philosophy by turning a range breakout into a structured planning question: is the escape mature, confirmed, readable, and supported by clean room?
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can guarantee continuation, reversal, or follow-through.
This tool provides structured visual context and rule-based attention markers. It does not provide certainty.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk. Market conditions can change quickly, and no script can remove uncertainty.
Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and decisions.
This script is for educational and analytical use only and does not provide financial advice.
📚 Educational Note
Use the planner to study how mature ranges resolve, how escape quality changes after the first break, and how obstruction room affects the readability of breakout continuation.
Indicator
Pre-Breakout Pressure Planner [AGPro Series]Pre-Breakout Pressure Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is pressure building before a breakout, or is the setup still premature?
📌 Overview / What it does
Pre-Breakout Pressure Planner is a chart-first breakout readiness tool designed to evaluate pressure before price leaves a range.
The script maps an active pressure box, upper and lower trigger corridors, directional buildup side, volume support, fakeout-risk context, invalidation reference, and target-room projection. These factors are converted into a 0-100 Pressure Score with a clear next-action state such as Bull Pressure, Bear Pressure, Coil Watch, Premature, Fakeout Risk, or Trigger Review.
It does not predict breakouts, automate entries, or confirm post-breakout acceptance. It is built to help traders organize the pre-breakout decision process before reacting to price movement.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who want to evaluate whether a breakout setup is becoming valid before the breakout actually happens.
Many traders notice a range only after price has already moved. This tool focuses on the earlier planning phase: Is the range compressed? Is one side applying pressure? Is volume supportive? Is the candle behavior constructive? Is there fakeout risk near the boundary?
The design supports a planning mindset. It helps the user read pressure quality, risk location, target room, and next-action context without turning the chart into a generic signal board.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most breakout tools focus on the moment price breaks a level.
This script does NOT focus on post-breakout confirmation, measured move corridors, generic support/resistance boxes, or simple buy/sell labels.
Instead, it evaluates the setup before the break. The core question is whether pressure is building in a structured way or whether the range is still too early, too wide, too weak, or vulnerable to a fakeout.
This keeps the concept separate from consolidation breakout tools. The purpose is not to grade a completed breakout. The purpose is to organize the pre-breakout readiness window.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script builds a live pressure range from prior bars and evaluates whether price remains inside the active box, probes a boundary, or enters a trigger corridor.
2. Reference Mapping
It maps the pressure box, upper trigger corridor, lower trigger corridor, active-side invalidation reference, and projected target-room reference.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The model scores range compression, higher-lows or lower-highs buildup, relative volume behavior, candle pressure, and close location inside the box.
4. Visual Output
The script displays the active pressure box, centered status label, trigger corridors, optional risk/target guides, compact event labels, alerts, and a premium AGPro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Pressure Box = the active range where pre-breakout pressure is being evaluated.
Trigger Corridors = narrow upper and lower zones where breakout review becomes relevant.
Risk / Target Guides = active-side invalidation and target-room references used for planning context.
Labels = compact state markers showing pressure, watch, fakeout risk, or trigger-review context.
Colors = teal supports bullish buildup, pink supports bearish buildup, amber marks neutral or developing pressure, and red marks elevated fakeout risk.
Panel = summarizes Pressure Score, Buildup Side, Volume Support, Fakeout Risk, Risk / Target, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• Bull Pressure → bullish buildup is forming inside the pressure box near the upper trigger context.
• Bear Pressure → bearish buildup is forming inside the pressure box near the lower trigger context.
• Coil Watch → compression or pressure exists, but the directional side is not clear enough yet.
• Premature → the setup does not yet meet the pressure score or structural requirements.
• Fakeout Risk → a boundary probe appears with weak support, poor candle pressure, or elevated rejection risk.
• Trigger Review → price has entered or crossed a trigger corridor and deserves context review.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts can trigger when bullish pressure appears, bearish pressure appears, fakeout risk appears, or price enters trigger-review context.
Each alert is an attention marker. Alerts are not trade instructions, entry commands, exit commands, or automated strategy rules.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest pressure read appears when multiple conditions align:
Range compression + directional buildup + supportive relative volume + constructive candle pressure + close location near the active trigger side.
When these conditions weaken, the planner can shift toward Coil Watch, Premature, or Fakeout Risk.
📊 When to Use
• Before evaluating a potential range breakout.
• During tight ranges where pressure may be building on one side.
• Around breakout watchlists where fakeout risk needs context.
• During volatility compression before expansion attempts.
• On liquid symbols where ATR, range boundaries, and relative volume are meaningful.
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity symbols with unreliable candles or volume.
• Very noisy micro-timeframes where range boundaries change too often.
• News-driven volatility spikes where pre-breakout pressure can distort quickly.
• Markets where the recent range is too wide to represent meaningful compression.
• As a standalone reason to enter or exit a trade.
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Pressure Range Lookback → controls the prior range used to build the active pressure box.
• Buildup Slope Lookback → controls how the script measures rising lows or falling highs.
• Sensitivity → changes how strict the compression model is.
• Minimum Pressure Score → sets the score needed for Bull Pressure or Bear Pressure states.
• Volume Support Level → defines constructive relative volume before breakout.
• Trigger Corridor ATR Width → controls the size of the upper and lower trigger corridors.
• Invalidation Buffer ATR → controls the active-side invalidation reference.
• Target Room Multiple → projects target-room context from the pressure range height.
• Visual settings → control boxes, guides, labels, panel visibility, panel location, theme, and font sizes.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is designed to be chart-first.
The main visual object is the active pressure box with a centered status label. Trigger corridors are narrow and controlled so the chart does not become a generic zone map. Event labels are compact, offset away from candles, and limited by cooldown and maximum-visible settings.
The AGPro panel follows the standard publication layout with a single merged blue title row, adjustable panel location, adjustable theme, and adjustable font size.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel Pressure Score and Action.
2. Check whether the pressure box is tight or still too wide.
3. Review the Buildup Side and Volume Support rows.
4. Check whether Fakeout Risk is Low, Moderate, or Elevated.
5. Compare the active trigger corridor with invalidation and target-room context.
6. Treat labels and alerts as attention markers inside broader analysis.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A high Pressure Score means the pre-breakout setup is more organized according to the script's rule set. It does not mean price must break out.
Bull Pressure and Bear Pressure describe directional buildup, not guaranteed direction.
Fakeout Risk means the boundary behavior deserves caution and context review. It does not mean a breakout cannot continue later.
Trigger Review means price is interacting with a corridor. It is a review state, not a command.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine.
• Not financial advice.
• Not auto trading.
• Not guaranteed signals.
• Not a buy/sell signal service.
• Not a post-breakout confirmation engine.
• Not a generic support/resistance zone map.
• Not an order-block, FVG, or supply/demand scanner.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
The script depends on selected lookback values, ATR normalization, relative volume behavior, and current timeframe.
Different symbols may compress differently. Some markets can show pressure for a long time before expansion. Others may probe a boundary and return inside the range several times.
The model is rule-based. Outputs should always be interpreted with broader structure, volatility, liquidity, and trader-defined risk controls.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Pre-breakout pressure is useful because the quality of a range can change before the breakout candle appears.
Rising lows can show pressure toward the upper boundary. Falling highs can show pressure toward the lower boundary. Volume support and candle pressure help judge whether that buildup is constructive or weak.
The script organizes these factors into a clean planner view so the user can decide whether the setup deserves attention, patience, or caution.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price remains inside a tight range and the panel shifts to Bull Pressure with supported volume, the upper trigger corridor becomes the main review area.
When price presses into a boundary but the panel shows Elevated Fakeout Risk, the user can recognize that the probe may be weak or vulnerable to rejection.
When the score stays low and the state remains Premature, the range may need more time before it deserves attention.
🧱 System Philosophy
Pre-Breakout Pressure Planner follows the AGPro decision-engine approach: a script should help traders evaluate setup quality, risk, target room, and next action without promising an outcome.
The goal is not to add another signal. The goal is to improve the quality of the planning process before the chart forces a decision.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can guarantee direction, continuation, breakout success, or outcome.
This tool provides structured pre-breakout context only.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk controls, position sizing, and trading decisions.
This script does not provide financial advice, investment advice, or guaranteed trading outcomes.
📚 Educational Note
Use the script to study how pressure builds inside ranges before breakout attempts.
The strongest learning value comes from comparing the panel state, pressure box, trigger corridors, and fakeout-risk labels with the broader chart context.
Indicator
Execution Window Planner [AGPro Series]Execution Window Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Where is the cleanest active price window for evaluating execution context?
📌 Overview / What it does
Execution Window Planner is a chart-first execution-readiness tool built to answer one practical question: is price currently sitting inside a clean review window, or is the context too early, too late, too stretched, or already invalidated?
The script maps an active execution window box, a risk edge, a target edge, compact state labels, and a premium AGPro panel. It converts window width, structure alignment, volatility fit, trend support, candle confirmation, and room-to-risk context into a transparent 0-100 Quality Score.
It does not predict price movement, automate orders, or issue buy/sell commands. The output is designed as an analytical planning layer for traders who want cleaner context before making their own execution decisions.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who already have a directional thesis but need a disciplined way to judge whether the current price area is actually usable for execution review.
Many tools show trend, signals, support/resistance, or zones. The missing piece is often the active decision window: the price area where risk is still definable, target room still exists, volatility is not distorted, and confirmation is not too weak.
The design philosophy is simple: execution quality should be evaluated through a defined window, not through excitement around a single candle.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on printing a signal, marking a generic support/resistance area, or showing a large multi-feature trading dashboard.
This script does NOT act as a full trading suite, signal service, position sizing tool, ICT/FVG map, order block map, or generic zone scanner.
Instead, it keeps one narrow purpose: identify and score the current execution window using risk edge, target edge, structure, volatility, trend support, and candle confirmation. The result is a focused decision layer rather than another broad indicator.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script detects the active planning side automatically from trend structure, or lets the user force a long-bias or short-bias view.
2. Reference Mapping
It builds a risk edge from recent structure and a target edge from broader structure or ATR-adjusted room.
3. Window Construction
It creates an active execution window around the current trend reference, then limits that window between the risk edge and target edge.
4. Reaction Evaluation
It scores window width, structure alignment, volatility fit, trend support, and candle confirmation into a 0-100 Quality Score.
5. Visual Output
The chart displays the execution window box, risk/target edges, state labels, alerts, and a premium AGPro panel with the key decision fields.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Execution Window = the current price area where the script is evaluating execution context.
Risk Edge = the structure-based invalidation edge for the active window.
Target Edge = the nearest meaningful target-side reference or ATR-adjusted room marker.
Labels = the current window state, score tier, risk distance, and room-to-risk context.
Colors = teal for stronger bullish execution windows, pink for bearish or invalidation contexts, amber for forming/waiting states, and indigo for target-edge or transition states.
Panel = the fastest summary of window state, quality score, risk edge, target edge, and next action.
🚦 Signals & States
• ACTIVE → the execution window meets the quality threshold and confirmation filter.
• FORMING → the window is improving but still needs cleaner confirmation.
• WAIT → the context exists, but structure, volatility, room, or confirmation is not strong enough yet.
• BLOCKED → there is no clean execution window in the current context.
• TARGET EDGE → price has reached the mapped target-side reference and reaction quality should be evaluated.
• INVALIDATED → price closed beyond the active risk edge.
🔔 Alerts Logic
ACTIVE Window alerts trigger when the state upgrades into ACTIVE.
Downgrade alerts trigger when the active window weakens from a stronger previous state.
Risk Edge alerts trigger when price closes beyond the current risk edge.
Target Edge alerts trigger when price reaches the current target edge.
Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trading instructions.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest execution-window context appears when several conditions align:
• Price remains inside the mapped execution window
• The risk edge is still structurally valid
• The target edge leaves enough room relative to risk
• Trend support agrees with the active side
• Candle structure confirms the same direction
• Volatility is close to its recent baseline
When these elements align, the Quality Score improves and the panel state becomes easier to interpret.
📊 When to Use
• When you already have a directional thesis and want to evaluate execution context
• During trend continuation setups where risk and target references remain clear
• Around pullback or reset areas where timing and risk quality matter
• Before reacting to a potential continuation candle
• When you want a cleaner planning layer instead of another simple signal indicator
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• During very low-liquidity conditions where candles print irregularly
• During high-noise chop where risk and target edges change too quickly
• During extreme volatility spikes where ATR context becomes distorted
• On symbols with poor price continuity or unreliable session behavior
• As a standalone reason to enter or exit a trade
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Setup Direction → Auto detects the active planning side, or the user can force Long Bias / Short Bias.
• Sensitivity → controls how selective the model is.
• Structure Lookback → controls how risk edge, target edge, and structure context are mapped.
• Minimum ACTIVE Score → defines the score threshold required for ACTIVE state.
• Confirmation Mode → controls how much trend and candle confirmation must align.
• Label Cooldown Bars → controls historical label density.
• Max Visible Labels → limits older state labels to keep the chart readable.
• Label Detail → Compact is the default clean publication view; Balanced and Full can show more risk/room context.
• Label Offset Strength / Lane Strength → smart placement controls that keep labels near price without burying them inside candles or pushing them too far away on higher timeframes.
• Panel Location / Theme / Font Size → controls the AGPro panel presentation.
• Label Font Size → controls all on-chart labels.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The panel is designed as a compact decision dashboard, not a large command center. The first row uses the standard AGPro merged blue header row, and the remaining rows focus only on the information needed to evaluate the current execution window.
The chart visuals stay restrained: one active execution window, one risk edge, one target edge, a current quality tag, and moderate historical state labels. The goal is a premium, readable chart that does not feel empty but also avoids clutter.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state first.
2. Check whether price is inside or near the execution window.
3. Compare the risk edge and target edge.
4. Review the Quality Score and confirmation state.
5. Interpret labels as context markers, not as trade commands.
6. Confirm the broader market context with your own process.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
ACTIVE does not mean guaranteed continuation. It means the current window has passed the script's rule-based quality model.
FORMING means the setup may be developing, but the script does not yet see enough confirmation.
WAIT means the context may exist, but the window quality is not clean enough.
BLOCKED means the current chart does not offer a useful execution window under the selected settings.
TARGET EDGE means the chart has reached the mapped target-side reference, so reaction quality becomes more important than chasing the move.
INVALIDATED means the risk edge has been broken and the active window should be reset.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not an auto-trading system
• Not a guaranteed signal tool
• Not a full trading suite
• Not an ICT/FVG or order block map
• Not a generic support/resistance zone scanner
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Execution-window quality is rule-based and depends on the selected inputs, timeframe, symbol behavior, and available chart data.
Different timeframes can produce different risk and target edges because market structure changes with resolution.
Fast volatility expansion can make the current edge distances less stable.
Low-volume markets may produce weaker confirmation quality.
The script should be interpreted inside broader market context, not in isolation.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Execution quality is usually strongest when structure, volatility, and trend behavior are aligned.
If volatility expands too quickly, the window can become stretched even if direction looks strong.
If the target edge is too close, the setup may have limited room even when the trend looks clean.
If the risk edge is too far away, the setup may require too much tolerance relative to the available room.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price pulls back toward the active trend reference, remains inside the execution window, and the risk edge is still structurally protected, the Quality Score may improve.
When price reaches the target edge after an ACTIVE window, the script can shift into TARGET EDGE state so the user can evaluate reaction behavior instead of treating the move as fresh.
When price closes beyond the risk edge, the window becomes INVALIDATED and the panel shifts to a reset-oriented state.
🧱 System Philosophy
Execution Window Planner follows the AGPro Series approach: build scripts that help traders make a decision, not just see another signal.
The script is intentionally narrow. It focuses on one practical question and keeps the chart output centered around that question.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can provide certainty.
No score guarantees future movement.
No alert should be treated as an instruction to trade.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own analysis, execution choices, risk management, and trading outcomes.
This script is for educational and analytical use only and does not provide financial advice.
📚 Educational Note
The best use of this script is to study how execution context changes as price moves between risk edge, execution window, and target edge.
Use it as a structured planning aid, not as a replacement for your own market analysis.
Indicator
Setup Lifecycle Tracker [AGPro Series]Setup Lifecycle Tracker
🧠 Core Idea
What stage is this setup in right now: forming, armed, triggered, invalidated, or expired?
📌 Overview / What it does
Setup Lifecycle Tracker is a chart-first setup planning tool that follows a developing market structure through a defined lifecycle window.
Instead of showing another isolated signal, it maps the setup stage, trigger rail, invalidation rail, expiry marker, time risk, and a 0-100 lifecycle quality score directly on the chart.
The script does not predict price, automate execution, or tell users what to trade. It organizes setup context so the trader can evaluate whether the setup is still valid, still early, close to activation, already invalidated, or simply too old.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who want a cleaner way to manage setup timing.
Many setups look interesting when they first appear, but they often decay, trigger too late, or lose their invalidation logic before the trader reacts. Setup Lifecycle Tracker fills that gap by turning setup timing into a visible planning structure.
The design philosophy is simple: a setup should have a stage, a deadline, a risk reference, and a clear next-action state. Without those elements, the chart can become another collection of loose signals.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on entry markers, setup scores, or generic support and resistance levels.
This script does NOT try to clone a setup scorecard, create a buy/sell system, or build a broad support/resistance map.
Instead, it tracks the lifecycle of one active setup window. It shows whether the setup is forming, armed near the trigger rail, already triggered, invalidated by its risk rail, or expired because too much time has passed.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script reads trend context, recent range structure, volatility, candle behavior, and volume support to decide whether a clean setup window can be tracked.
2. Reference Mapping
When a setup forms, the script creates a trigger rail, an invalidation rail, and a lifecycle window between them.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The model evaluates setup maturity, trigger proximity, confirmation strength, time decay, and invalidation distance to produce a 0-100 lifecycle score.
4. Visual Output
The active lifecycle window, stage labels, trigger rail, invalidation rail, expiry marker, candle tint, and panel summarize the current state.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the lifecycle window between trigger and invalidation.
Labels = current lifecycle stage and optional score.
Colors = stage context:
• Blue / indigo = forming
• Yellow = armed
• Green = triggered
• Red / pink = invalidated or expired
Panel = the compact AG Pro summary showing Stage, Quality Score, Time Risk, Invalidation, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• FORMING → a setup window has been detected but is not yet close enough to the trigger rail.
• ARMED → price is close enough to the trigger rail and the lifecycle score is strong enough to deserve attention.
• TRIGGERED → the tracked setup moved beyond its configured trigger condition.
• INVALIDATED → price crossed the invalidation rail and the setup context is no longer valid.
• EXPIRED → the setup stayed active too long without a useful lifecycle resolution.
🔔 Alerts Logic
The script includes alerts for:
• New lifecycle window forming
• Setup armed near the trigger rail
• Setup triggered
• Setup invalidated
• Setup expired
• High-quality lifecycle threshold reached
Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions, automated entries, or guaranteed outcome signals.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The lifecycle score becomes stronger when setup maturity, trigger proximity, confirmation strength, time health, and invalidation fit align.
For example, a setup that is mature, close to the trigger rail, supported by directional candle behavior, and not too close to invalidation will generally score better than an old setup with weak confirmation and high time risk.
📊 When to Use
• Breakout preparation
• Pullback continuation planning
• Range compression before expansion
• Setups that need a time limit
• Charts where invalidation needs to stay visible
• Traders who want to separate early setups from late setups
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity markets
• Charts with unreliable volume and erratic candles
• Very noisy micro timeframes
• Extreme volatility spikes where ATR-based references expand too quickly
• Situations where the user wants a direct buy/sell signal instead of a planning map
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Setup Side → selects automatic, long-side, or short-side lifecycle tracking.
• Trigger Model → controls how the setup moves into TRIGGERED state.
• Setup Lookback → defines the forming range used for trigger and invalidation mapping.
• Sensitivity → changes how strict the lifecycle detection and confirmation logic feels.
• Expiry Bars → controls how long an untriggered setup can stay active.
• Minimum Quality Score → defines the threshold for stronger lifecycle contexts.
• Panel / Label Settings → control panel position, theme, font size, label size, and label density.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is built around a single chart-first lifecycle window.
The panel is intentionally compact. It does not replace the chart; it summarizes the active state so the user can quickly read the setup stage, score, time risk, invalidation, and next context action.
Labels are kept moderate and offset away from candles to preserve readability.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel stage.
2. Check the lifecycle window between trigger and invalidation.
3. Watch whether the setup moves from FORMING to ARMED.
4. Review the trigger rail and invalidation rail.
5. Use the expiry marker to avoid stale setup interpretation.
6. Confirm the broader market context before making any decision.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A high lifecycle score means the current setup context is cleaner according to the script's rule set.
An ARMED state means the setup is close to the trigger area, not that a trade must be taken.
An EXPIRED state means time quality has degraded.
An INVALIDATED state means the tracked setup lost its mapped risk reference.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not an auto-trading tool
• Not a guaranteed signal system
• Not a generic support/resistance mapper
• Not a clone of Setup Quality Scorecard
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Lifecycle windows depend on lookback, ATR behavior, and recent structure.
Different timeframes can produce different setup stages.
High-volatility conditions may expand rails and change score behavior.
Low-liquidity symbols can create unstable ranges and misleading candle structure.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Setup lifecycle quality is strongest when structure, volatility, and timing align.
A setup can be technically visible but still weak if it is too old, too far from the trigger rail, too close to invalidation, or unsupported by confirmation behavior.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price compresses below a range edge and the lifecycle window turns ARMED, the trader can observe whether the trigger rail is reached before the expiry marker.
When a setup remains FORMING for too long, the time risk row helps identify whether the context is becoming stale.
When price crosses the invalidation rail, the script marks the lifecycle as INVALIDATED so the previous setup is no longer treated as active.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGPro tools are designed to help traders read market context with structure and restraint.
Setup Lifecycle Tracker follows that philosophy by converting setup timing into a visible planning workflow instead of adding another isolated signal marker.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can provide certainty.
No score, state, label, or alert guarantees future price behavior.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
This script is for educational and analytical use only.
It does not provide financial advice, investment advice, or guaranteed trading outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions, risk management, and position sizing.
📚 Educational Note
The main educational purpose of this script is to help users think in lifecycle stages: setup formation, activation risk, invalidation, time decay, and context review.
Indicator
Breakeven Review Planner [AGPro Series]Breakeven Review Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Has the move progressed enough to review breakeven protection, or is the context still too early, weak, or exposed?
📌 Overview / What it does
Breakeven Review Planner is a trade-management overlay designed to evaluate post-activation move progress. Instead of asking users to manually draw a full entry, stop, and take-profit plan, the script detects a qualified directional move, anchors an activation reference, builds a structural invalidation shelf, and measures live R progress from that context.
The output is a clean breakeven review workflow: a BE review zone, activation reference, invalidation shelf, current R reading, trend-support state, pullback-risk state, event labels, alerts, and a premium AGPro panel.
It does not predict price direction, place trades, calculate position size, build a take-profit ladder, or tell users to move a stop. Alerts and labels are attention markers for review context only.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who already manage active moves and need a cleaner way to evaluate whether the move has earned a breakeven review.
The gap it fills is not pre-trade risk/reward planning. AGPro already has tools for that. This script focuses on the management phase after a move is active: progress, structure, trend support, and pullback risk.
The design supports a disciplined review mindset. It helps users read whether the chart has built enough progress to deserve attention without turning that review into an automated instruction.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most risk/reward tools focus on manual entry, stop-loss, targets, position sizing, and breakeven probability.
This script does NOT build a full trade plan, does NOT create TP ladders, and does NOT tell users to move a stop.
Instead, it watches the live chart for a qualified management context, scores the move's progress toward a breakeven review threshold, and keeps the user focused on whether the current structure is strong, weak, stale, or invalidated.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script detects directional activation when price escapes recent structure with enough ATR-normalized impulse, candle commitment, close-location quality, and trend support.
2. Reference Mapping
After activation, the script anchors an activation reference and builds an invalidation shelf from the latest confirmed swing plus an ATR buffer.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The engine measures current R, best favorable R, trend support, candle quality, volatility fit, and pullback depth after progress.
4. Visual Output
The chart displays the BE review zone, progress fill, context lines, event labels, candle tint, alerts, and the AGPro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the BE review area around the configured R trigger. It is a review zone, not a command.
Labels = context markers such as armed context, progress milestones, BE review, pullback watch, stale context, and invalidation.
Colors = teal for bullish-supported context, pink for bearish or invalid context, amber for caution, and indigo for breakeven review focus.
Panel = the current decision cockpit. It shows Review Score, Current R, BE Trigger, Progress State, Trend Support, and Action.
🚦 Signals & States
• Bull Context Armed → a bullish management context was activated after structure escape.
• Bear Context Armed → a bearish management context was activated after structure escape.
• BE Review Active → current progress reached the configured R threshold for breakeven review.
• Review + Pullback → price reached review progress but has pulled back enough to require closer attention.
• Stale → the context spent too many bars without enough progress.
• Invalidated → price reached the structural invalidation shelf.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when a new management context activates, the BE review zone is reached, the review quality is high, pullback risk increases after review progress, the invalidation shelf is reached, or the context becomes stale.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trading instructions, broker actions, or automated stop-management commands.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest review context appears when R progress, trend support, candle close quality, controlled pullback depth, and normal volatility fit align.
When these conditions align, the Review Score rises and the panel state becomes easier to interpret.
📊 When to Use
• Active directional moves after structure expansion
• Trend continuation environments
• Breakout follow-through review
• Trade-management review after favorable progress
• Charts where users want R-style context without a full manual RR planner
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Very low-liquidity symbols
• Extremely noisy ranges
• News shock candles with distorted ATR behavior
• Non-standard chart types that alter candle structure
• Situations where the user needs exact broker-level stop management
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Sensitivity → changes how quickly or strictly the script activates a management context.
• Structure Lookback → controls the recent structure boundary used for activation.
• BE Review Trigger (R) → sets the R threshold for review-zone activation.
• Invalidation Shelf Buffer ATR → controls how much ATR padding is added beyond the latest swing.
• Pullback Warning Depth (R) → controls when post-review pullback risk is marked.
• Visual settings → control labels, zones, progress fill, line extension, candle tint, and object limits.
• Panel settings → control panel visibility, location, theme, and font size.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The panel follows the AGPro public-release standard with one merged blue header row containing only the script name.
The chart is designed to stay active but not crowded. It uses a single review zone, clean context lines, a subtle progress fill, and capped event labels.
Label and panel font sizes are adjustable, with Normal as the default.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel Review Score and Progress State.
2. Check whether price is below, inside, or beyond the BE review zone.
3. Compare Current R with best favorable R to understand whether progress is expanding or pulling back.
4. Confirm whether trend support is still aligned.
5. Treat alerts as review prompts, not as automated trade actions.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A high score means the move has progressed toward the review zone with stronger internal structure according to the script's rules.
A low score means the move is early, weak, stale, pulling back, or structurally invalidated.
The most useful interpretation comes from reading score, state, trend support, and invalidation together instead of relying on a single label.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
• Not a prediction engine
• Not financial advice
• Not auto trading
• Not guaranteed signals
• Not a position sizing calculator
• Not a manual risk/reward visualizer
• Not a take-profit planner
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
The activation model is rule-based and depends on recent structure, ATR, candle behavior, and trend filters.
Different timeframes can produce different activation references and invalidation shelves.
Fast volatility expansion can make R progress move quickly, while low volatility can keep contexts stale.
No rule-based tool can know a user's actual broker order, risk tolerance, or execution plan.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Breakeven review is most useful when progress, structure, and volatility are read together.
A move can reach a review zone while still having weak trend support or heavy pullback risk.
The script is designed to keep those differences visible.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price breaks recent structure, trend support is aligned, and current R approaches the BE review threshold, the panel may shift from Building to Approaching Review.
When current R reaches the configured BE trigger and the score is strong, the script marks the review zone and can trigger a high-quality review alert.
When best favorable R was strong but current R pulls back by the configured amount, the script marks Pullback Watch instead of treating the move as automatically healthy.
🧱 System Philosophy
The AGPro approach is to turn chart information into structured decision context.
This script follows that philosophy by converting move progress into a clean review framework: activation, invalidation, R progress, trend support, pullback risk, and next review state.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
This script does not provide certainty.
It does not guarantee that a breakeven review will improve trade outcome.
It only organizes the conditions that may make breakeven review context more visible.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
Users are responsible for their own analysis, execution, risk management, and decisions.
This script is for educational and analytical purposes only and does not provide financial advice.
📚 Educational Note
Use the tool to study how active moves progress, stall, pull back, or invalidate around a structured management threshold.
Indicator
Choppiness Setup Planner [AGPro Series]Choppiness Setup Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is this choppy market still a no-trade environment, or has it matured into a valid setup with defined risk, invalidation, and targets?
📌 Overview / What it does
Choppiness Setup Planner is a planner-style overlay built for one of the most common decision problems in technical analysis: what should a trader do when price is trapped inside a choppy range, but pressure starts building near the edge?
The script detects no-trade chop conditions, builds a decision range around the active structure, scores setup quality from 0 to 100, and turns a mature range release into a clear planning map with invalidation and target levels. Instead of only saying "the market is choppy," it answers whether the setup is still avoidable, preparing, weak, valid, active, or invalidated.
The cleanest visual use case is higher-timeframe planning. Weekly and daily charts allow the full range-to-plan lifecycle to breathe: no-trade structure, preparation, release, target, and invalidation can all be read without the chart feeling crowded.
It does not automate execution, predict future price, or replace personal trade selection. It is an analytical planner designed to organize context, risk, and next-action state directly on the chart.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built because many market-state tools show information without helping the user make a decision. A Choppiness Index value, ADX filter, or range box can be useful, but those outputs often stop before the practical question: what now?
Choppiness Setup Planner fills that gap by connecting chop detection with a structured planning workflow. It is intended for discretionary traders, breakout traders, and range-to-expansion traders who want to avoid low-quality noise while preparing for stronger releases from mature ranges.
The design philosophy is simple: first protect attention, then qualify the setup, then map risk only when the structure deserves it.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most tools focus on detecting chop, drawing a box, or marking a breakout.
This script does NOT act like a generic signal indicator, generic support/resistance tool, or simple Choppiness Index panel.
Instead, it turns a choppy market into a decision sequence:
1. Detect the no-trade environment.
2. Track range age and pressure.
3. Grade setup validity with a 0-100 score.
4. Define the next action state.
5. Map invalidation and targets only after a valid release.
That makes the script closer to a decision engine than a visual marker. It is also intentionally separated from manual position planners: users do not enter their own position parameters. The script derives its planning levels from the detected chop range and the release quality model.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The engine blends Choppiness Index, directional weakness, path efficiency, range tightness, wick noise, and volatility behavior to determine whether the market is inefficient enough to qualify as a no-trade chop environment.
2. Reference Mapping
When chop persists long enough, the script builds a decision range around the active structure. This range is not a generic support/resistance zone; it is a planning container for the current no-trade condition.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The script evaluates whether pressure is improving through range age, chop release, ADX lift, path-efficiency improvement, ATR lift, edge pressure, candle body quality, close quality, and optional volume participation.
4. Visual Output
The chart displays the no-trade ribbon, decision range box, centered zone label, preparation markers, valid plan markers, weak-release markers, invalidation level, target levels, and a compact AGPro planner panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones represent the active no-trade decision range. A centered label inside the box shows whether the structure is still a no-trade zone or has moved into preparation mode.
Labels represent state changes. PREP marks a mature range with improving setup quality. PLAN UP and PLAN DN mark valid releases. SKIP marks a release that happened but failed the minimum plan-quality threshold. T1, T2, and INVALID track the active plan lifecycle.
Colors follow the AGPro state palette. Teal is used for stronger upside planning states, pink for downside or invalidation states, amber for caution and no-trade states, and indigo for preparation/readiness.
The panel shows Setup Quality, Next Action, Chop / Ready, Range Age, Invalidation, and Targets.
🚦 Signals & States
• Avoid: Chop → the market is inefficient and still belongs in no-trade mode.
• Prepare: Edge Watch → the range has matured and internal readiness is improving.
• Skip: Low Quality → price released from the range, but the quality score was not strong enough.
• Track Upside Plan → upside release met the minimum valid plan score.
• Track Downside Plan → downside release met the minimum valid plan score.
• Manage: T1 Reached → the active plan reached its first target level.
• Review: T2 Reached → the active plan reached its second target level.
• Reset: Invalidated → the active plan crossed its invalidation level.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts are available for preparation state, valid upside plan, valid downside plan, weak release, Target 1 reached, Target 2 reached, and invalidation.
Each alert is an attention marker. Alerts are not trade instructions, not automation rules, and not execution commands.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The setup becomes stronger when a mature chop range aligns with improving readiness, edge pressure, candle body participation, release distance, and optional volume participation.
When these components align, the script can convert the release into a valid plan. When price releases without enough score, the script marks the event as SKIP instead of treating every breakout as useful.
📊 When to Use
• Choppy markets where the user needs a no-trade filter.
• Weekly, daily, and 4H planning where range structure matters more than micro-noise.
• Mature ranges that may be preparing for expansion.
• Breakout-preparation workflows.
• Range-to-trend transition monitoring.
• Symbols where invalidation and target structure should be visible before acting.
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely illiquid markets with unreliable candles.
• Symbols where volume data is misleading, unless volume participation is disabled.
• News-driven spikes where a single candle can distort range logic.
• Very low timeframes with excessive spread noise.
• Scalping workflows that require rapid-fire signals instead of structural planning.
• Markets where the user has no broader context for trend, liquidity, or session behavior.
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Choppiness Length → controls the chop-detection backbone.
• Decision Range Length → controls how the active no-trade range is framed.
• Minimum Range Age → controls how long chop must persist before planning begins.
• Preparation Threshold → controls when the range moves from avoid mode to preparation mode.
• Minimum Valid Plan Score → controls how selective valid plan labels should be.
• Release Buffer ATR → controls how far price must move beyond the range boundary.
• Invalidation Buffer ATR → controls the distance behind the released boundary used for invalidation.
• Target 1 / Target 2 R Multiples → control target projection from the plan risk.
• Panel Location / Theme / Font Size → control the AGPro panel interface.
• Label Font Size / Cooldown / Maximum Visible Labels → control chart readability.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is designed around fast decision reading. The chart carries the range box, no-trade ribbon, centered zone label, event labels, and active risk/target levels. The panel summarizes the same workflow without becoming a large dashboard.
The first panel row follows the AGPro standard: one merged blue header row containing only the script name.
Visual density is intentionally moderate. The chart should not look empty, but it should also avoid crowded signal spam.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel.
Check Setup Quality and Next Action first.
2. Check the decision range.
If the box says NO-TRADE, the structure is still inefficient. If it says PREP, the range is maturing.
3. Evaluate the release.
A valid PLAN label means the release met the quality threshold. A SKIP label means the release was not strong enough.
4. Review invalidation and targets.
When a plan is active, use the plotted levels to understand structure, not as automatic orders.
5. Confirm broader context.
Combine the planner output with trend, liquidity, timeframe, session, and personal execution rules.
For publication screenshots, higher-timeframe examples are usually the cleanest because they show the complete planning sequence without compressing labels and boxes into a noisy layout.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
Think in states, not isolated signals.
NO-TRADE protects attention.
PREP means the market is becoming more interesting.
PLAN means the release has enough structure to track.
SKIP means the release happened but did not earn quality.
INVALID means the plan lost its structural premise.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
This script is not a prediction engine.
It is not financial advice.
It is not auto trading.
It is not guaranteed signals.
It is not a strategy tester.
It is not a replacement for independent analysis.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
The script is rule-based and depends on selected inputs, timeframe, volatility, and available market data.
Different symbols and sessions can produce different behavior. Low liquidity, sudden volatility shocks, and abnormal gaps can reduce the usefulness of range-based planning.
Volume participation is optional because volume quality differs across markets and feeds.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Chop is not always weakness. Sometimes it is absorption, sometimes indecision, and sometimes simple noise. The script does not claim to know the cause. It organizes the observable structure so the user can decide whether the environment is worth attention.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price spends several bars inside a tight inefficient range and the panel says Avoid: Chop, the script is acting as a no-trade filter.
When the range matures and the centered label changes to PREP, the script is showing that pressure has improved enough to monitor the edge.
When price releases and receives PLAN UP or PLAN DN, the script maps invalidation and targets from the structure.
When price releases but receives SKIP, the script is saying the event did not meet the model's quality threshold.
On weekly charts, a single valid plan can show the entire decision chain: range maturity, preparation, release, target reaction, and invalidation. This is the strongest showcase environment for the script.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGPro tools are built around structured decision support: define the condition, score the quality, map the relevant structure, and keep the chart readable.
Choppiness Setup Planner follows that philosophy by turning a noisy no-trade environment into a cleaner decision workflow.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No script can provide certainty.
No score guarantees follow-through.
No label guarantees an outcome.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk. Market conditions can change quickly, planned setups can fail, and losses can occur. This script is provided for educational and analytical use only. It does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes. Users remain responsible for their own analysis, decisions, risk management, and execution.
📚 Educational Note
Use this script to study how choppy markets mature, how range releases differ in quality, and how invalidation and target logic can be organized visually before a decision is made. Indicator
Gap Fill Reaction Planner [AGPro Series]Gap Fill Reaction Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is this gap reaction actually ready for planning, or is it just another rectangle on the chart?
📌 Overview / What it does
Gap Fill Reaction Planner is a planner-style price action tool built around gap fill behavior, reaction quality, and execution readiness. Instead of simply drawing gap zones, it evaluates whether the active gap reaction has enough structure to become a measurable plan.
The script detects gap support and gap resistance zones, tracks fill progress, classifies reaction state, and converts the active setup into a 0-100 readiness score. It also maps a live entry reference, invalidation level, target projection, and estimated R multiple so the user can review the structure as a plan rather than as an isolated signal.
It does not automate trades, predict future price, or replace independent analysis. Its purpose is to organize gap reaction context into a cleaner decision framework.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built to move beyond passive gap marking. A normal gap indicator can show where a gap exists, but it does not answer the questions that matter before a trade idea is considered:
Is the reaction valid?
How strong is the setup?
Where is the invalidation?
Where is the target?
What should the trader watch next?
Gap Fill Reaction Planner was designed for traders who want a structured workflow around opening gaps, continuous-market reaction bands, partial fills, full fills, rejection behavior, and acceptance risk. The mindset is not "take every gap." The mindset is "measure the reaction first."
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most gap tools focus on detection. They draw every gap, imbalance, or separation zone and leave the decision process to the user.
This script does NOT act as a generic gap highlighter, generic support/resistance map, or broad imbalance catalog.
Instead, it treats each gap as a planning object. Every active zone is evaluated through fill depth, reaction state, volatility context, participation, age, and structural validity. The panel then translates that context into readiness, next action, invalidation, target, and risk/reward information.
That planner layer is the difference. The script helps the user decide whether a gap reaction deserves attention, not merely whether a gap exists.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script first searches for gap reaction zones. It prioritizes classic open-to-previous-close gaps, then supports adaptive reaction bands for continuous markets where clean opening gaps may be rare.
2. Reference Mapping
Each detected zone receives a fixed-length rectangular band. The zone is not dragged forward forever; it remains anchored to its origin so old structures do not distort the current chart. Thin zones are displayed with a minimum visual height so the chart keeps a cleaner, more professional planning layer.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The engine tracks fill percentage, partial fill, full fill, rejection, and acceptance. Rejection behavior is treated differently from simple fill behavior because a filled gap and a rejected gap communicate different planning context.
4. Planner Scoring
The readiness score combines gap size, fill quality, reaction behavior, volatility participation, and recency. The score is normalized from 0 to 100.
5. Risk / Target Projection
For the active planner zone, the script calculates an invalidation reference beyond the far side of the gap and projects a target using the selected R multiple.
6. Visual Output
The chart shows gap zones, centered zone labels, optional fill progress, planner labels, and active plan levels. The panel summarizes the decision state.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones
Gap Support zones represent upward gap reactions that may act as support-style planning areas.
Gap Resistance zones represent downward gap reactions that may act as resistance-style planning areas.
Zone Labels
Focused zones can display a centered label showing the zone role, state, and readiness score. This keeps the chart readable without turning every historical zone into a text cluster.
Colors
Bullish planner context uses the AGPro green state color.
Bearish planner context uses the AGPro pink state color.
Neutral or unfinished context uses restrained secondary colors.
Panel
The panel shows readiness, next action, plan side, gap size, fill/state, invalidation, target/R, and bias.
Plan Levels
When an active planner zone exists, the script can display entry reference, invalidation, and target lines.
🚦 Signals & States
• Fresh → A new gap zone exists but has not reached meaningful fill depth.
• Partial Fill → Price has returned into the gap enough to begin reaction monitoring.
• Rejected → Price filled part of the gap and then closed back away from the zone.
• Full Fill → The gap has reached the full-fill threshold and becomes more neutral.
• Accepted → Price closed beyond the far boundary of the gap, meaning the zone has lost its original reaction role.
• Planner Ready → A rejection setup reached the configured readiness threshold.
🔔 Alerts Logic
New Gap Support Zone
Triggers when a bullish gap support planning zone is created.
New Gap Resistance Zone
Triggers when a bearish gap resistance planning zone is created.
Gap Partial Fill
Triggers when a tracked zone reaches the partial-fill threshold.
Gap Full Fill
Triggers when a tracked zone reaches the full-fill threshold.
Gap Planner Ready
Triggers when a rejection setup reaches the readiness score threshold.
Gap Acceptance
Triggers when price accepts beyond the far side of the gap.
Alerts are attention markers and workflow prompts. They are not trade instructions.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The planner score becomes stronger when multiple conditions align:
• The gap has enough ATR-normalized size
• Fill depth is meaningful but not exhausted
• Reaction behavior confirms away from the zone
• Current volatility and participation support the reaction
• The zone is recent enough to remain relevant
When these pieces align, the gap becomes a stronger planning candidate.
📊 When to Use
• After large opening gaps
• During pullbacks into gap support or gap resistance
• Around partial fill and rejection behavior
• In trending markets where gaps create reaction shelves
• In volatile markets where gap fill behavior matters
• On crypto and FX charts where adaptive reaction bands may help continuous-market analysis
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity symbols
• Very noisy micro timeframes
• Market conditions where spread, slippage, or data quality is poor
• When the chart is moving too fast for structured planning
• When a trader has not defined broader market context
🎛️ Key Inputs
Detection Mode
Controls whether the script uses only classic open gaps or adaptive reaction bands.
Minimum Gap Size
Filters out small gaps using ATR normalization.
Readiness Threshold
Defines the minimum score required for a planner-ready label.
Target Multiple (R)
Projects the target from the current reference price using the invalidation distance.
Invalidation Buffer
Adds ATR-based spacing beyond the far side of the gap zone.
Zone Right Extension
Controls how far each zone projects from its origin.
Panel / Label Settings
Control panel visibility, panel theme, panel location, and font sizes.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is built for quick decision review. The panel provides the planner summary, while the chart emphasizes the most important structural elements: premium-height zones, focused centered labels, action labels, and active plan levels.
The visual hierarchy is intentionally clean. Zones explain context, labels explain state, and the panel explains what to do next from an analytical standpoint.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel readiness score.
2. Check whether the next action is monitor, wait, plan, or stand aside.
3. Review the active gap zone and its centered label.
4. Compare fill percentage with the reaction state.
5. Review invalidation and target levels.
6. Confirm the idea with broader market context before acting.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A high score does not mean certainty. It means the gap reaction has stronger planning structure.
A partial fill means price has started interacting with the gap, but reaction quality still matters.
A rejection state is more meaningful when it occurs with strong score, clean invalidation, and acceptable target distance.
An accepted zone should usually be treated as a failed reaction context rather than an active planning area.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
This script is not a prediction engine.
This script is not an automated trading system.
This script is not a financial advice tool.
This script does not provide guaranteed outcomes.
This script does not replace risk management, trade review, or independent confirmation.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Gap behavior can change significantly across symbols and timeframes.
Continuous markets may produce fewer classic opening gaps, which is why the script includes adaptive detection modes.
Volatility expansion can make targets and invalidation levels wider.
Low-liquidity environments may reduce the reliability of reaction labels and score readings.
No rule-based tool can fully account for news events, sudden liquidity shifts, or execution quality.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Gap reactions are often more useful when they are read together with trend structure, volatility, session behavior, and liquidity context. A gap zone is not automatically important because it exists. It becomes more useful when price returns to it, reacts clearly, and produces a measurable planning structure.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price returns into a Gap Support zone and rejects upward with a high readiness score, the panel can help review whether invalidation and target structure are measurable.
When price fills a Gap Resistance zone and accepts above it, the script marks the context as acceptance rather than treating the zone as a still-valid resistance area.
When the panel shows low readiness, the script is communicating that the structure may exist visually but is not yet a strong planner candidate.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGProLabs tools are built around structured interpretation. The goal is not to add more noise to the chart. The goal is to convert raw market behavior into a cleaner decision framework that traders can review with discipline.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can remove uncertainty.
No score can guarantee a result.
No planner can replace the trader's responsibility to manage risk.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk. This script is provided for educational and analytical use only. It does not provide financial advice, investment advice, or guaranteed trading outcomes. Users remain responsible for their own research, risk management, position sizing, and execution decisions.
📚 Educational Note
The best use of this script is not to chase every gap. The best use is to slow the decision process down, measure the reaction, and decide whether the setup is structured enough to deserve attention.
Indicator
Risk Reward Visualizer [AGPro Series]Risk Reward Visualizer
🔹 Overview
Risk Reward Visualizer is a professional trade-planning indicator that transforms every setup into a clean visual framework: entry, stop-loss, and up to three take-profit targets displayed as long rectangular R-multiple zones. Beyond basic visualization, it adds three features rarely found together in one tool — a breakeven probability calculator, live MFE/MAE excursion tracking, and an automatic trail-to-breakeven workflow.
The indicator is built for traders who think in R-multiples: swing traders, prop-firm candidates, day traders, and anyone who wants to answer the question "does this setup actually make mathematical sense?" before committing capital.
🔹 What Makes It Different
Most risk/reward scripts stop at drawing levels and a position-size table. This one goes further:
• Breakeven Probability Math — For every R target, the panel displays the minimum win rate required to break even, adjusted for round-trip fees. A 3R target needs only 25% wins; a 1R target needs 50%. Seeing this side-by-side reframes how you evaluate setups.
• Live MFE / MAE Tracking — Maximum Favorable Excursion and Maximum Adverse Excursion are tracked in real time from the moment the setup becomes valid. Labels mark the exact bar of each peak in R-multiples, with leader lines connecting the label to the wick, so you can grade trade quality after the fact.
• Trail-to-Breakeven Visualization — When TP1 is hit, the original stop fades and a new breakeven line is drawn at entry, making the risk management discipline visible on the chart.
• Hybrid Auto-Detect — Leave Entry and Stop at zero and the script fills them using the current close and the most recent swing pivot plus an ATR buffer. Provide one manually and the other auto-completes. Everything can be overridden.
🔹 Methodology
Levels are calculated from the standard R-multiple framework:
• Risk per unit = |Entry − Stop|
• Take-profit N = Entry ± (N × Risk per unit), signed by trade direction
• Breakeven win rate = (1 + fees_R) / (1 + R target)
Direction is auto-inferred from the relationship between Entry and Stop (Long when Stop is below Entry, Short otherwise), and can be forced. Auto-detect uses a pivot lookback to locate the most recent swing high or low, then offsets the stop by a user-defined ATR multiple to reduce wick-out risk.
MFE and MAE reset whenever Entry or Stop changes, so editing inputs restarts tracking cleanly. Hit detection uses bar high or low against each level and fires alerts only on the rising edge of each event.
🔹 Visuals & Signals
• Risk zone rendered as a pink rectangle between Entry and Stop
• TP1, TP2 and TP3 zones rendered as stacked teal rectangles with graded opacity
• Entry line in indigo, stop in pink, take-profits in teal
• Labels anchor to the right edge of the zone so they never hide candles
• MFE label on the favorable excursion peak, MAE on the adverse peak, each offset 1.5 ATR with a dotted leader line
• Alerts: TP1 hit, TP2 hit, TP3 hit, Stop Loss hit, Breakeven reached
🔹 Key Inputs
• Setup Mode — Manual, Auto-Detect, or Hybrid
• Trade Side — Auto, Long, or Short
• Entry and Stop — leave at zero to auto-detect
• Swing Lookback and ATR Buffer — for auto-detected stops
• TP1, TP2, TP3 multipliers with individual show/hide toggles
• Trail Stop to Breakeven After TP1 — toggle
• Round-Trip Fees (%) — folded into breakeven math
• Enable Position Size Calculator — optional; account size and risk percentage
• Panel location, panel font size, label font size, zone length, zone transparency
🔹 How To Use
Step 1 — Add the script to any symbol and timeframe. By default, Hybrid mode uses the current close as entry and the most recent swing plus an ATR buffer as stop.
Step 2 — Override Entry or Stop with your planned levels if you have a specific setup in mind.
Step 3 — Check the Breakeven Analysis section of the panel. Confirm the minimum win rate required for your chosen R target is realistic for your strategy.
Step 4 — Set alerts for the targets you want to be notified on. If Trail-to-Breakeven is enabled, you will also receive a notification when TP1 hits so you can move your stop in your broker.
Step 5 — After the trade, review MFE and MAE to grade execution. Did price reach favorable excursion that you missed? Did it dip deep into risk before resolving?
🔹 Limitations & Transparency
• This is a planning and visualization tool. It does not place orders and does not produce buy or sell signals.
• The breakeven calculation treats fees as a percentage of entry price converted into R-units. It is a useful approximation, not a tax or slippage model.
• Auto-detected stops depend on recent swing structure. On very low-liquidity symbols or during strong trends without pullbacks, recent swings may be stale. Verify visually before using.
• MFE and MAE tracking uses bar high or low and resets when inputs change.
• Position sizing assumes a linear contract value and does not account for margin, leverage, or instrument-specific tick rules. Always cross-check with your broker.
🔹 Risk Disclosure
Trading carries risk of loss. This indicator is provided for educational and analytical purposes only and is not financial advice. Past behavior of any tool does not guarantee future performance. Use proper position sizing and never risk more than you can afford to lose. Indicator
AG Pro Position Planner [AGPro Series]AG Pro Position Planner
OVERVIEW
AG Pro Position Planner is a structured trade-planning and risk-organization tool designed for traders who want to map a position before execution. It focuses on four core elements of trade preparation: entry location, stop placement, target mapping, and position sizing. Instead of trying to predict direction or generate automated entries, the script helps organize a plan around levels that the user defines manually.
The purpose of this tool is not to tell the user what to buy or sell. Its purpose is to turn a discretionary plan into a visible, measurable framework on the chart. By combining entry, stop, risk budget, capital usage, and target structure in one view, the script helps reduce planning ambiguity and makes the trade idea easier to review before any order is placed.
The script supports both long and short planning. It can also operate in two different target modes. In R-Based mode, targets are derived from the distance between entry and stop. In Manual mode, the user can input exact target prices directly and the script will convert those targets into their implied R-multiples. This allows the same tool to support both systematic planning and discretionary scenario mapping without changing the underlying workflow.
The visual design is intentionally restrained. The chart shows entry, stop, and target levels, along with optional reward and risk zones. A compact panel summarizes the key planning information, including direction, mode, risk per unit, risk budget, sizing, exposure, and target statistics. The result is a planning layout that remains readable on both light and dark themes while keeping the focus on structure rather than decoration.
WHAT THIS SCRIPT DOES
This script helps the user:
• define a planned entry price
• define a planned stop price
• convert account risk into a position size estimate
• map one to three targets on the chart
• compare manual targets to the initial risk distance
• review exposure before execution
• validate whether a manual target structure is logically ordered
• visualize the reward zone above entry and the risk zone below entry for long scenarios, or the inverse logic for short scenarios
The script is designed as a planning layer. It does not attempt to replace the user’s analysis process. It assumes the user already has a trade idea and needs a cleaner way to structure and review that idea.
UNIQUE EDGE
The distinguishing feature of this script is not signal generation. Its edge is organizational clarity.
Many tools focus on entries, signals, or directional interpretation. This one focuses on plan construction. The user chooses the key prices, and the script translates them into a coherent risk model. That distinction matters. The script does not present itself as a forecasting engine, a market-timing system, or an automated decision model. It is a position-planning framework.
A second differentiator is the dual target workflow. Some users think in fixed R-multiples. Others think in exact price objectives. AG Pro Position Planner supports both approaches in the same interface. In Manual mode, the script still reports the effective R-value of each target, which helps the user compare discretionary targets against the initial stop distance without losing consistency.
A third differentiator is the built-in validation behavior. The script checks whether the trade structure is logically valid for the chosen direction. In Manual mode, it also checks whether the targets are placed in the correct direction and in the correct order. This helps the user detect plan errors before execution rather than after the fact.
METHODOLOGY
The planning model is straightforward by design.
1) Entry and stop define the base risk distance.
The script measures the absolute distance between entry and stop. That distance becomes the reference risk per unit.
2) Account risk defines the risk budget.
The user enters an account size and a percentage risk per trade. The script converts this into a monetary risk budget.
3) Position size is estimated from the risk budget.
The script divides the risk budget by effective risk per unit and rounds the resulting quantity down to the selected quantity step.
4) Optional fee adjustment can be included.
An estimated fee percentage can be added to the per-unit risk as a conservative sizing buffer.
5) Targets are then mapped in one of two ways.
In R-Based mode, each target is calculated from the entry-to-stop distance using the selected R-multipliers.
In Manual mode, the user provides exact target prices and the script calculates the implied R-value of each target relative to the original stop distance.
6) Exposure statistics are summarized in the panel.
The panel shows stop distance, capital usage, risk budget, and sizing information so the trade can be evaluated as a complete plan rather than as isolated levels.
This methodology is intentionally transparent. The script is not using hidden directional filters, prediction logic, or undisclosed entry models. The calculations are derived from the user’s own inputs.
TARGET MODES
R-Based Mode
R-Based mode is intended for users who want a consistent structure around initial risk. The user defines entry and stop, then sets target multipliers such as 1R, 2R, or 3R. The script projects those levels automatically from the base risk distance. This is useful when the user wants standardized scenario planning and fast comparison between multiple setups.
Manual Mode
Manual mode is intended for users who work with exact price objectives. In this mode, the user enters target prices directly. The script then converts those levels into implied R-values. This allows discretionary targets to be measured against the same initial risk model.
To reduce planning mistakes, the script validates whether manual targets are placed in the correct direction and in the correct order for the chosen trade direction. Invalid target structures are flagged in the panel instead of being silently accepted.
PANEL AND VISUAL STRUCTURE
The chart can display:
• entry line
• stop line
• target lines
• reward zone
• risk zone
• right-side labels for entry, stop, and targets
• a compact summary panel
The panel is designed to keep the most useful information visible without taking over the chart. Its goal is to support review, not to dominate the screen.
The compact panel includes:
• plan summary
• validation badge
• entry and stop
• risk per unit
• risk budget
• sizing
• exposure
• target statistics
This structure is meant to help the user answer practical questions quickly:
How much is being risked?
How large is the position?
How much capital is being used?
How far is the stop?
What does each target represent in both price and R terms?
KEY INPUTS
Trade Setup
• Trade Direction
• Target Mode
• Entry Price
• Stop Price
• R-based targets
• Manual targets
Risk Model
• Account Size
• Risk Per Trade (%)
• Estimated Fees (%)
• Quantity Step
Visual Settings
• Panel visibility
• Panel position
• Panel theme
• Panel text size
• Level label size
• Label offset
• Risk/reward zone visibility
• Zone transparency
• Individual target visibility
These inputs are separated by function so the planning workflow stays readable and predictable.
VALIDATION AND SAFETY LOGIC
The script validates several conditions before presenting a plan as valid.
For direction:
• Long plans require stop below entry
• Short plans require stop above entry
For base structure:
• Entry must be positive
• Stop must be positive
• Account size must be positive
• Risk percentage must be positive
• Quantity step must be positive
• Entry and stop must not be identical
For manual targets:
• Targets must be in the correct direction relative to entry
• Targets must be logically ordered for the selected direction
If the structure is invalid, the panel reflects that status instead of presenting the setup as a clean plan. This behavior is intentional. The script is designed to help organize decisions, but also to prevent simple construction errors from being overlooked.
WHO THIS SCRIPT IS FOR
This script is intended for users who already make their own directional decisions and want a cleaner way to structure position plans on the chart.
It may be useful for:
• discretionary traders
• swing traders
• intraday traders
• users who plan entries and stops manually
• users who prefer fixed-R target mapping
• users who want manual targets translated into risk terms
• users who want better visual discipline before execution
It is less relevant for users who are looking for:
• automated entries
• hidden directional logic
• predictive signals
• scanner behavior
• portfolio automation
• strategy backtests
SIGNALS AND ALERTS
This script does not generate buy signals or sell signals.
This script does not publish automated trade calls.
This script does not attempt to identify market direction.
This script does not include alert logic for execution decisions.
Its purpose is planning, visualization, and risk organization.
LIMITATIONS AND TRANSPARENCY
This script is a planning tool, not an execution engine.
It does not know whether the selected entry will be filled.
It does not know whether slippage will occur.
It does not know whether the market will reach the defined targets.
It does not account for instrument-specific margin rules, liquidation mechanics, funding costs, or exchange-specific order behavior unless the user adjusts inputs manually.
The sizing output is an estimate based on the values entered into the script. Real-world execution may differ due to slippage, fees, order type, spread, partial fills, and instrument-specific trading conditions.
In Manual mode, the script evaluates the price structure entered by the user, but it does not claim that those targets are likely to be reached. It only expresses them relative to the initial risk distance.
The chart zones are visual planning aids. They are not probability forecasts and should not be interpreted as predictive boundaries.
WHAT THIS SCRIPT IS NOT
This script is not:
• a strategy tester
• a signal service
• an automated trade system
• a forecasting model
• a promise of profitability
• a replacement for independent analysis
• a substitute for execution judgment
• a guarantee of risk control in live market conditions
It is a structured chart tool for planning and reviewing position scenarios.
RISK DISCLOSURE
Trading and investing involve risk. Any planned setup can fail, and losses can exceed expectations due to slippage, volatility, or execution conditions. This script is provided as an organizational and visualization tool only. Users remain fully responsible for their own analysis, trade selection, order placement, and risk management decisions.
No indicator can remove market risk. A visually clean plan is still only a plan. Position sizing, stop placement, and target mapping should always be reviewed in the context of the instrument, timeframe, liquidity conditions, and the user’s own trading process.
FINAL NOTE
AG Pro Position Planner is built around a simple idea: a trade plan should be measurable before it is actionable. By turning entry, stop, risk budget, sizing, and targets into a single visible structure, the script aims to make discretionary planning more disciplined, more transparent, and easier to review.
The script does not attempt to decide for the user. It helps the user define the plan clearly enough to evaluate it. Indicator
